My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 02/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:16:12 PM
Creation date
2/10/2022 8:39:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/08/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
365
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy asked how many of these sites can be approved before the City does not <br />meet the density requirements of the Metropolitan Council. <br />Planning Manager McGuire Brigl commented that the City completes plat monitoring each year <br />to review the overall density. She stated that the City would allow more of these developments <br />but would have to provide denser development in other areas to offset. She stated that the City <br />cannot continue to allow sewered development less than three units per acre. She noted that <br />Riverstone South will provide the City with a bump in terms of density. She noted that continued <br />development in The COR should allow the City to continue to allow more rural development in <br />other areas. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if a variance could be used rather than a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment. <br />Planning Manager McGuire Brigl commented that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be <br />necessary in order to comply with the Metropolitan Council. She noted that the alternative would <br />be to allow smaller lots in order to increase the density. <br />Commissioner VanScoy expressed concern with the future impact of the amendment as written. <br />He commented that some of the measures are subjective, which is a concern. <br />Planning Manager McGuire Brigl commented that in order to use this, an applicant would need to <br />request a Comprehensive Plan Amendment based on the criteria and the decision would then be <br />of the City Council and Metropolitan Council. She stated that even though some of the language <br />may seem subjective, it is the same language within the variance criteria. She stated that the areas <br />where this could be used need to be mapped and that has been done very narrowly only <br />incorporating the two properties where the City would like to use this. <br />Commissioner VanScoy referenced the required density of three units per acre and asked if a unit <br />could be an apartment or townhouse. <br />Planning Manager McGuire Brigl confirmed that to be true. <br />Commissioner VanScoy referenced the current moratorium that the City Council has on high <br />density residential for City owned property within The COR and commented that would seem to <br />create a potential issue. <br />Planning Manager McGuire Brigl commented that if this passes tonight, the City would still be <br />over the three unit per acre threshold. She stated that apartments typically come in around ten to <br />15 units per acre which does help to boost the City's density calculation. She stated that if the City <br />Council wanted to allow the City to seek development of apartments that would help the density <br />calculation but commented that is not a need at this time. She noted that there is available land <br />within The COR that could be developed into apartment buildings that is not City owned. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that part of the issue that drove the development of The COR <br />and its density was to allow the City to develop while maintaining its rural character. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.