Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Services Director Lasher summarized the discussion regarding Union Contract <br />negotiations with LELS-Patrol stating that the City Council has agreed to the terms of the tentative <br />agreement. The Patrol Unit Contract, which will be a three-year contract, will be presented for <br />City Council approval on January 11, 2022. <br /> <br />2.02: Discuss Ordinance #21-11 Amending Chapter 10 of City Code: Animals <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator/Community Development Director Hagen reviewed the staff report <br />and recommendation to amend Chapter 10 of the City Code. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if the Council had any questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove provided a recap for the Council. She stated that the goals were to <br />make the animal ordinance user-friendly, code enforcement- friendly, and more concise. Changes <br />that were made included a beekeeping rezoning permit, bringing horses in this chapter instead of <br />being a separate chapter, and reducing some verbiage that was redundant. She noted guidance was <br />given to Planning Technician McCann and Deputy City Administrator/Community Development <br />Director Hagen to make the document easier to read and understand. She stated one question that <br />came up was whether the Council wanted to remove the inclusion of cats based on the Chief’s <br />comments. <br /> <br />Police Chief Katers commented that the current contract with the vendor for animal impoundment <br />does not include cats. Historically, the only time cats have been taken, in is if they bite someone, <br />which is a requirement. His concern was about potential stray cats and people collecting cats or <br />bringing them to the pound. Some costs could be incurred although he wasn’t sure what that cost <br />would be. He noted the budgetary line item with the current vendor has been dropped from 4,000 <br />to 2,000 based on the number of dogs. The vendor is pretty good at adopting out the dogs rather <br />than euthanizing them as had been done in the past. That is a consideration as well. He explained <br />cats had not been included previously in the history of the ordinance and it would require a contract <br />re-write with the vendor that they also accept cats, which they do, just not from Ramsey. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked the Council if there was an interest to add cats. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied that she was okay with it since it sounds like it is a very rare <br />occurrence. She stated when she was reviewing the case, there was no State statute on “at large” <br />cats for licensing for cats. From her understanding, whatever the Council includes is what goes <br />for the City, there is nothing for cats from a State level. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if there was enough to proceed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if anyone else had feedback. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma stated if there was no more feedback, cats could be left out. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / December 14, 2021 <br />Page 2 of 10 <br /> <br />