My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/15/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2022
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 02/15/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:36:30 AM
Creation date
2/11/2022 9:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
02/15/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented that she could see that this would be something considered <br />for City owned land. She asked the source of funding, whether TIF or EDA funds could be used. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that trees would not be eligible for TIF. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood commented that the Finance <br />Director may support this as an element of streetscape. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that he would be very reluctant to use that <br />type of funding. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she would support using EDA dollars as the intention <br />would be to make the area more marketable for development. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that they could leave the funding source open with the intention to <br />review the use of TIF or EDA funds. <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that staff should then present this to the <br />EDA to obtain its funding. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that if the trees can be protected from future development, <br />she would have less concern. She asked the benefit or lack of benefit to add in the cost for the <br />sidewalk and electricity, if TIF funds could be used. She commented that it would seem to make <br />sense to go into that area one time to complete those improvements. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that the difference would be the substantial cost <br />difference. He stated that while it is a good idea in terms of efficiency, the trees are a good long- <br />term investment that could be done now while the sidewalk could sit dormant for ten years. <br />Chairperson Riley agreed that while he likes the idea, trees would gain value, but the sidewalk <br />would lose value. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood commented that a sidewalk would <br />have a design cost of about $20,000 and then a full bidding process would need to be followed. <br />He agreed that a sidewalk would have a cost in excess of about $500,000 to $700,000. <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to authorize an <br />RFP for the installation of boulevard trees and irrigation on City owned properties in The COR, <br />consistent with the proposed Capital Improvement Project. <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Musgrove asked that discussion occur with the other property <br />owners to determine if they would like to participate as well. Chairperson Riley agreed that he <br />would love to see other property owners participate but would not want the City to be paying for <br />improvements on private property. <br />Public Works Committee / January 18, 2022 <br />Page 13 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.