Laserfiche WebLink
Public Works Superintendent Riemer reviewed the case and stated that based on the fact that there <br /> is no dedicated funding source for this project at this time, staff recommends continuing with the <br /> current maintenance practice, until such time a funding source can be developed to pave the <br /> remaining gravel roads. <br /> Chairperson Riley asked if the total of gravel roads includes 173`d which will be paved as a part of <br /> the Makowsky development. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer confirmed that to be true. <br /> Chairperson Riley asked about the lifespan of the current grader. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that $4,000 was recently spent on repairs and <br /> estimated a lifespan of two to three years or more depending on the ongoing maintenance needs. <br /> He estimated a replacement cost of$350,000 to $400,000. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked why FEMA 2019 numbers were used. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that FEMA updates those numbers every two years. <br /> He stated that the 2021 numbers were just released but the case was drafted in November. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if including this on the CIP would be a good idea so that it can <br /> continue to be considered. She asked if any of these street segments would be eligible for TIF. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that TIF is not available this far north and the project <br /> has not been included in the CIP. <br /> Chairperson Riley stated that the idea of replacing gravel roads has been a continued discussion. <br /> He stated that perhaps this paving could occur prior to the time the grader would need to be <br /> replaced. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if federal grant funding has been pursued for this purpose. <br /> Public Works Superintendent Riemer replied that he has not explored that option and was unsure <br /> if that would be a funding source for this type of project. He noted that paving some of the gravel <br /> roads would be easier than others as some go through wetlands or adjacent to the river which <br /> would have additional costs for wetland impacts and drainage requirements. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if any of those roads with wetland impacts would qualify for <br /> distribution of wetland funding. <br /> City Engineer Westby replied that he did not believe they would be eligible projects as they are <br /> not included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the projects were placed in the CIP would they then be an <br /> eligible project. <br /> Public Works Committee/January 18, 2022 <br /> Page 2 of 15 <br />