Laserfiche WebLink
very nicely. She understands the reluctance to try the first one, but she thinks it should be <br />utili×cd. <br /> <br />(iouncihnember Jeffi'ey indicated the roundabout and the boulevard median would be good <br />fcaturcs l'or the development as long as they are maintained. <br /> <br />]'he Council and staff discussed maneuverability for snow plow and emergency vehicles in <br />relation to the cul-de-sac median. <br /> <br />(iouncihncmber Cook stated he would like to have the cul-de-sac median looked at closer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig concurred. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained these issues do not need to be determined at <br />thc time of preliminary plat. Staff can work through the design and bring it back at final plat. <br />tie indicated there are a couple of other issues to address. Based on past experiences with <br />County officials, accesses onto County roads are eliminated as much as possible. The second <br />conncction to Nowthen Boulevard may be an issue and could be turned into a cul-de-sac instead <br />of second access. <br /> <br />Councihnember Olson inquired about the distance between the two accesses onto Nowthen <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the distance between the accesses would be <br />approximatcly 1/8 mile. He indicated the last issue to discuss is the connection to 167th Avenue <br />via Marble Street recommended by staff. He explained generally everyone in this subdivision <br />will bc traveling south and east. There currently are a number of accesses, one to 167th Avenue, <br />two to the existing neighborhood on the east, and two proposed on CR 5. The number of <br />households expected to utilize the proposed access to 167th Avenue is approximately 260 <br />vehicles. This would be close to 500 trips per day that would utilize the 167tnAvenue access, <br />rather than past existing homeowners going south on 167th Avenue with the future realignment <br />of 167~h Avcnue. The Planning Commission recornl'nended against including the access. Staff <br />recommends including an outlot to allow for the access that would be released if the property to <br />thc cast develops and provides an alternative connection. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Strommen requested clarification that the idea is to preserve the outlot for the <br />possibility of a future connection, and that there would not be a connection at the end of the <br />Ovcrtooms' driveway if they do not redevelop their property. <br /> <br />Assistant Pnblic Works Director Olson responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig expressed concern with wrapping up this entire project, which has so <br />many thcets to it, into another larger contingency of the east/west lateral, which is a much larger <br />conversation for the City overall. He suggested this contingency be removed from this <br />development, with action taken to keep the east/west lateral moving forward. <br /> <br />City Council / September 13, 2005 <br /> Page 15 of 33 <br /> <br /> <br />