|
4386 Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 18/Thursday, January 27, 2022/Rules and Regulations
<br /> COVID-19 response be exempted from these employees,recipients may use • Step Four:Subtract the actual
<br /> the calculation of number of employees. SLFRF funds for payroll and covered number of FTEs from the adjusted pre-
<br /> Many commenters also requested an benefit costs that are obligated by pandemic baseline to calculate the
<br /> expanded set of eligible uses beyond December 31, 2024 and expended by number of FTEs that can be hired and
<br /> restoring their workforce up to the pre- December 31, 2026, consistent with the covered by SLFRF funds.
<br /> pandemic baseline. Commenters Uniform Guidance's Cost Principles at 2 Recipients may use SLFRF funds to
<br /> requested that funding be able to be CFR part 200 Subpart E. This option cover payroll and covered benefit costs
<br /> used to avoid layoffs,provide back pay, provides administrative simplicity for obligated by December 31, 2024,and
<br /> retain employees through pay increases recipients that would simply like to expended by December 31, 2026,up to
<br /> and other retention programs, or restore pre-pandemic positions and the number of FTEs calculated in Step
<br /> reimburse salaries and benefits already would not like to hire above the pre- Four,consistent with the Uniform
<br /> paid. Some commenters also requested pandemic baseline. Guidance's Cost Principles at 2 CFR part
<br /> clarification as to whether recipients To pursue the second option, 200 Subpart E.Recipients may only use
<br /> can fund re-hired positions through the recipients should undergo the analysis SLFRF funds for additional FTEs hired
<br /> period of performance and on the provided below.In short,this option over the March 3, 2021 level of
<br /> definition of payroll and benefits. Other allows recipients to pay for payroll and budgeted FTEs (i.e.,the actual number
<br /> commenters requested preferential covered benefits associated with the of FTEs);note again that recipients may
<br /> hiring for workers laid off,a strong recipient increasing its number of choose whether to conduct the analysis
<br /> commitment to equity,and a budgeted full-time equivalent of FTEs that can be covered by SLFRF
<br /> requirement that funds would not be employees (FTEs)up to 7.5 percent funds on a government-wide basis or for
<br /> used to pay for contract or temporary above its pre-pandemic employment an individual department,agency, or
<br /> replacement workers during a labor baseline,which adjusts for the authority.
<br /> dispute. continued underinvestment in state and These FTEs must have begun their
<br /> Treasury Response:The final rule local governments since the Great employment on or after March 3, 2021,
<br /> allows for an expanded set of eligible Recession. State and local government which is the beginning of the period of
<br /> uses to restore and support public sector employment as a share of population in performance. For administrative
<br /> employment.Eligible uses include 2019 remained considerably below its convenience,recipients do not need to
<br /> hiring up to a pre-pandemic baseline share prior to the Great Recession in demonstrate that the reduction in
<br /> that is adjusted for historic 2007,which presented major risks to number of FTEs was due to the COVID—
<br /> underinvestment in the public sector, recipients mounting a response to the 19 pandemic,as Treasury assumes the
<br /> providing additional funds for COVID-19 public health emergency. vast majority of employment reductions
<br /> employees who experienced pay cuts or The adjustment factor of 7.5 percent during this time were due to pandemic
<br /> were furloughed, avoiding layoffs, results from estimating how much larger fiscal pressures on state and local
<br /> providing worker retention incentives, 2019 state and local government budgets. Recipients do not need to hire
<br /> and paying for ancillary administrative employment would have needed to be for the same roles that existed pre-
<br /> costs related to hiring. for the share of state and local pandemic.
<br /> Restoring pre-pandemic employment. government employment to population For illustration, consider a
<br /> In response to comments and in 2019 to have been back at its 2007 hypothetical recipient with 1,000
<br /> recognizing underinvestment in public budgeted FTEs on January 27, 2020 (950
<br /> sector employment,the final rule level and is intended to correct for this filled FTE positions and 50 unfilled FTE
<br /> expands the ability to use SLFRF funds gap' positions). The recipient's pre-
<br /> to restore pre-pandemic employment. Recipients should complete the steps pandemic baseline is 1000 FTEs;its
<br /> Treasury is also clarifying how,and the described below.Recipients may choose hh d his anal adjusted pre-pandemic baseline is 1,000
<br /> extent to which,recipients may use weter to conduct this on a * 1.075 = 1075 FTEs. Now,assume that
<br /> SLFRF funds to rehire public government-wide basis or for an on March 3, 2021,the recipient had 800
<br /> employees. individual department, agency, or budgeted FTEs in total (795 filled FTE
<br /> The final rule provides two options to authority. positions and 5 unfilled FTE positions),
<br /> restore pre-pandemic employment, • Step One:Identify the recipients with 50 FTEs primarily dedicated to
<br /> depending on recipient's needs. Under budgeted FTE level on January 27, 2020. responding to the COVID-19 public
<br /> the first and simpler option,recipients This includes all budgeted positions, health emergency. The recipient would
<br /> may use SLFRF funds to rehire staff for filled and unfilled. This is called the have the option of using either 800 FTEs
<br /> pre-pandemic positions that were pre-pandemic baseline. or 750 FTEs as its actual number of
<br /> unfilled or were eliminated due the • Step Two:Multiply the pre- FTEs for the calculation; assuming it
<br /> pandemic without undergoing further pandemic baseline by 1.075 (that is, 1 chooses the lower number,it would be
<br /> analysis. Under the second option,the +adjustment factor). This is called the able to fund up to 325 FTEs with SLFRF
<br /> final rule provides recipients an option adjusted pre-pandemic baseline. funds (that is, 1,075—750 = 325 FTEs).
<br /> to hire above the pre-pandemic baseline • Step Three:Identify the recipients, bud eted FTE level on March 3, 2021,
<br /> by adjusting the pre-pandemic baseline g consider public health and safety FTEs to be
<br /> for historical growth in public sector which is the beginning of the period of entirely devoted to mitigating or responding to the
<br /> employment over time,as well as
<br /> performance for SLFRF funds. COVID-19 public health emergency if the FTE,or
<br /> his or her operating unit of division,is primarily
<br /> flexibility on roles for hire. Recipients Recipients may,but are not required to, dedicated to responding to the COVID-19 public
<br /> may choose between these options but exclude FTEs dedicated to responding health emergency.Recipients may also consider
<br /> cannot use both. to the COVID-19 public health other presumptions for assessing the extent to
<br /> emer enc 244 This is called the actual which an FTE,division,or operating unit is
<br /> To pursue the first option,recipients g y• engaged in activities that respond to the COVID-19
<br /> may use SLFRF funds to hire employees number of FTEs. public health emergency,provided that the
<br /> for the same positions that existed on recipient reassesses periodically and maintains
<br /> January 2 7 2020 but that were unfilled 244 Recipients may determine that a portion of an records to support its assessment,such as payroll
<br /> ' FTE's time is dedicated to responding to the records,attestations from supervisors or staff,or
<br /> or eliminated as of March 3, 2021, COVID-19 public health emergency.Further,for regular work product or correspondence
<br /> without undergoing further analysis.For administrative convenience,the recipient may demonstrating work on the COVID-19 response.
<br />
|