|
Federal Register/Vol. 87, No. 18/Thursday, January 27, 2022/Rules and Regulations 4425
<br /> administrative interpretations would grants,or other types of interventions requested clarification on the scope of
<br /> not include corrections to replace prior that do not reduce tax revenue.354 In changes that would be considered as
<br /> inaccurate interpretations; such addition,by including changes in conforming to recent changes in federal
<br /> corrections would instead be treated as regulation or administrative law. These commenters requested that
<br /> changes implementing legislation interpretation,in addition to changes in Treasury clarify whether actions to
<br /> enacted or regulations issued prior to law,within the scope of the offset selectively conform with federal law
<br /> the covered period. The operative provision,the ARPA recognizes that a would be considered covered changes
<br /> change in those circumstances is the recipient government may make a and requested clarification regarding the
<br /> underlying legislation or regulation that covered change through its legislature or extent to which changes would be
<br /> occurred prior to the covered period. may delegate the authority to make a considered"recent."For example,these
<br /> Moreover, only changes within the covered change including,but not commenters requested clarification
<br /> control of the state or territory are limited to,to a sub-unit of government. regarding conformance with the Global
<br /> considered covered changes. Finally, Treasury has revised the definition of Intangible Low-Taxed Income provision
<br /> covered changes do not include changes "covered change"in the final rule using of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Some
<br /> that simply conform with recent the statutory language above to make commenters further argued that changes
<br /> changes in federal law(including those clear that the offset provision only that selectively conform or decouple
<br /> to conform to recent changes in federal applies to such changes in law, from the Internal Revenue Code should
<br /> taxation of unemployment insurance regulation,or administrative be included within scope of covered
<br /> benefits and taxation of loan forgiveness interpretation.With respect to the changes and thus subject to the offset
<br /> under the Paycheck Protection question of whether covered changes provision.
<br /> Program). could include administrative decisions Treasury Response:The final rule
<br /> Scope of Covered Changes applicable to individuals, as discussed maintains the treatment of changes that
<br /> above,a covered change includes a simply conform with recent changes in
<br /> Public Comment:Several commenters change in law,regulation, or federal law,such as those to conform to
<br /> argued that the definition of covered administrative interpretation that recent changes in federal taxation of
<br /> change,and thus the limitations of the reduces any tax. Such changes may unemployment insurance benefits and
<br /> offset provision,should apply to apply to one or more individuals or taxation of loan forgiveness under the
<br /> subsidies for businesses. Similarly, entities,provided that—consistent with Paycheck Protection Program 355 and
<br /> other commenters requested that the statutory text—they result from a including other changes over the past
<br /> Treasury clarify that the offset provision change in law,regulation, or several years.Regardless of the
<br /> applies to tax abatements and administrative interpretation. particular method of conformity and the
<br /> reductions in corporate taxes,even if effect on net tax revenue,Treasury
<br /> administered b a sub-unit of the Prior Enactment and Phase-In
<br /> Y views such changes as permissible
<br /> recipient government. Citing to Public Comment:A number of under the offset provision.
<br /> empirical research and other evidence, commenters expressed concern, or Accordingly, and for the reasons
<br /> these commenters argued that these requested clarification,regarding discussed above,Treasury is
<br /> types of economic development policies changes that were enacted prior to the maintaining the definition of covered
<br /> were poorly administered,reduced covered period but take effect or phase- change without change.
<br /> public sector capacity, and were in during the covered period. Several ineffective at achieving stated objectives commenters argued that the definition Tax revenue. The interim final rule,s
<br /> of creating jobs,increasing income, and of covered change should include definition of"tax revenue"is based on
<br /> increasing economic growth. On the changes that were made prior to the the Census Bureau's definition of taxes,
<br /> other hand,some commenters argued ued coveredperiod but that p g phase-in during used for its Annual Survey of State
<br /> '
<br /> that because subsidies were the covered period.eriod. Government Finances.356 It provides a economically similar to some tax cuts, Treasury Response:As discussed consistent,well-established definition
<br /> neither action should be considered a above,the offset provision is triggered with which states and territories will be
<br /> covered change and subject to the offset by a reduction in net tax revenue familiar and is consistent with the
<br /> provision. Finally, other commenters resulting from"a change in law, approach taken in section Revenue Loss
<br /> requested that Treasury clarify whether regulation,or administrative of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
<br /> covered changes must be broad-based interpretation"made during the covered describing the implementation of
<br /> policies or whether administrative period. Consistent with the statutory sections 602(c)(1)(C) and 603(c)(1)(C) of
<br /> decisions applicable to individuals text, "covered change"is defined to the Social Security Act regarding
<br /> would be considered covered changes. include any final legislative or revenue loss. A number of commenters
<br /> Treasury Response:Section regulatory action,a new or changed expressed concern and requested
<br /> 602(c)(2)(A) applies to any change that administrative interpretation, and the clarification regarding the definition of
<br /> phase-in or taken effect of an statute "tax revenue."These comments and
<br /> "reduces any tax (by providing fora p g Y
<br /> reduction in a rate, a rebate, a or rule where the phase-in or taking responses are discussed in section
<br /> deduction,a credit,or otherwise or effect was not prescribed prior to the Revenue Loss of this Supplemental
<br /> delays the imposition of any tax or tax start of the covered period. Information and,for the reasons
<br /> increase."Accordingly,and consistent discussed above,Treasury is finalizingConformity the definition of tax revenue without
<br /> with this statutory text,the final rule
<br /> applies to covered changes that reduce Public Comment:A number of
<br /> any tax,which can include tax commenters requested clarification on 355 See Statement on State Fiscal Recovery Funds
<br /> the scope of covered than and Tax Conformity,April 7,2021,available at
<br /> changes.abatements,but does not apply to loans, P g https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/
<br /> Specifically,several commenters jy0113.
<br /> Policy Center,How do state earned income tax 356 U.S.Census Bureau,Annual Survey of State
<br /> credits work?,https://www.taxpolicycenter.orgl 354 Assistance must be consistent with eligible and Local Government Finances Glossary,https://
<br /> briefing-book/how-do-state-earned-income-tax- uses of SLFRF funds.See section Eligible Uses of www.census.gov/programs-surveys/state/about/
<br /> credits-work/(last visited May 9,2021). this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. glossary.html(last visited Apr.30,2021).
<br />
|