Laserfiche WebLink
she wanted to do an excellent job for both. She stated she would commit to doing her best but she <br />has one Deputy Clerk and one HR Assistant and they are both maxed. She repeated she will do <br />her best. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented that hearing the distress in her voice. He asked if there was <br />reconsideration into looking at an outside firm. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that if it is going to be done in-house that the Staff needs <br />to be trusted to eliminate candidates. He thought that was a fair trade off for everyone’s sanity and <br />time. He thought the first round could be between five and ten. He thought it was a completely <br />fair ask of Administrative Service Director Lasher and Staff to put some trust in them to get the <br />Council a good pool to start with and then go to second round together. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman agreed with trusting Staff to narrow the pool so it is not at 21 but then <br />giving Council the opportunity to look at the applicant pool and see if there is someone they are <br />interested in. If there is a Councilmember and second, that would have a max of three candidates. <br />He recommended aiming for eight candidates and a Councilmember and a second could nominate <br />somebody that doesn’t make the list that way, if the Council could still go back to the constituents <br />and say they participated. To Councilmember Riley’s point, Councilmember Heineman stated it <br />is not a try, that they can do it in-house and do a good job. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell suggested the Council needed to sit down and determine the criteria rather <br />than patching it together. To Councilmember Heineman’s point, she noted including a candidate <br />that was not originally if two Councilmembers agree, that is a good point. She stated having the <br />opportunity to look at resumes, she was able to catch anomalies in a resume and eliminate a poor <br />candidate. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to recruit internally. <br /> <br />2.02: Annual Planning Session <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich facilitated the Annual Planning Session. He stated that last year a lot of <br />time was taken reviewing the strategies and a check up on the mission, vision and values so they <br />will do the same tonight. He stated he wanted to focus more on a strategic level and at the end of <br />this, they will have some strategies and things they want to accomplish. Staff will go back and fill <br />in some tactics on how to achieve those strategies and bring those back for a second Work Session <br />in the evening similar to what was done last year, and more if needed. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich started the session with having the members brainstorm for a Big Hairy <br />Audacious Goal (BHAG) or stretch goal for the organization. He stated this may influence some <br />of how they look at strategies or tactics moving forward. He noted it is important as it creates a <br />huge long term target or goal and energizes an organization and focuses its people, rallying them <br />to common causes and leading them through a process of transformation. He gave examples of <br />other organizations including Google, Tesla, SpaceX, the City of Anoka and the City of Chaska. <br />He stated that the City of Chaska has been successful in using “Best Small Town in Minnesota” <br />as their motto, which has gotten them a lot of positive publicity. He stated one of the strategies <br />City Council Special Work Session / February 15, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 31 <br /> <br />