Laserfiche WebLink
<br />body and is a use of force against the individual. If a person doesn’t have autonomy over their <br />body what else do they have, they should have the right to choose. She continued that no one at <br />any level or government could know what conditions exist for individuals that may suite the <br />collective just fine. She supports the individual’s right to chose for themselves and not have to <br />prove a need for a medical exemption or religious reason. She is glad they are taking a proactive <br />step for everyone. Councilmember Heineman stated that default to liberty shouldn’t be <br />exemptions, it should be recognizing liberties. He understood that there are public health <br />initiatives but to have people prove why they shouldn’t have their liberties stipped away is not <br />right. People should be granted liberties which includes wearing a mask or not to, to take a vaccine <br />or not to. He stated seatbelt laws were passed by elected legislature which is different than what <br />has been seen recently so the comparison isn’t fair. He invited the public to comment. Jeff <br />Johnson, 14540 Bowers Drive, commented that they are not consistent and this conversation <br />shouldn’t be disguised as public safety because they just voted to have more bars and taprooms <br />open which bring an added risk of accidents. Councilmember Specht commented that he thinks <br />this is a matter of liberty, nondiscrimination, and keeping the government out of the way. <br />Councilmember Howell thanked the resident for making his point. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman aye <br />Councilmember Woestehoff nay <br />Councilmember Specht aye <br />Councilmember Musgrove aye <br />Councilmember Howell aye <br />Councilmember Riley nay <br />Mayor Kuzma nay <br /> <br />Motion carried. <br />7.09: Fairness and Equal Opportunity in Public Notices and Advertisements <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated this was an initiative of Councilmembers Howell and Musgrove. <br />He stated the judge sent an email stating there could be more of a vetting process of candidates <br />with either the Charter Commission or Council having a role. He stated it is the Staff’s <br />recommendation to discuss the process for filling the Charter Commission positions realizing the <br />current process isn’t perfect and could be improved upon. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell presented the staff report giving examples of anomalies regarding <br />postings for applications of the Charter Commission openings. She stated this doesn’t reflect at <br />all on Communications and Events Coordinator Thorstad. She stated Councilmember Woestehoff <br />had been appointed to the Charter Commission and she felt that the typical process hadn’t been <br />followed for this appointment. She asked who made the decision to put January 21, 2022 for the <br />application deadline. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich replied it was made by the City Clerk, which he supports, because there <br />is a 60-day window to fill the Charter Commission position required by statute. The notices for <br />City Council / February 22, 2022 <br />Page 21 of 34 <br /> <br />