My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:25:43 AM
Creation date
3/10/2022 9:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />done the work needed and the fact that they don’t have their due diligence done now isn’t the <br />Council’s problem. He didn’t want to be the impediment for this but stated they have had ample <br />time and he didn’t know why this is taking so long. City Engineer Westby stated he just added <br />this case this morning. He stated from Staff’s perspective, the oak wilt concern is an issue and the <br />timeline is trying to be met so the trees can come down and prevent the spread of the disease by <br />cutting the trees down too late. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Specht, Musgrove, Heineman, and <br />Woestehoff. Voting No: Councilmembers Riley and Howell. <br />7.11: Adopt Resolution #22-056 Approving Assessment Agreements for Improvement <br />Project #20-05, Riverdale Drive Extension, Llama Street to Bowers Drive <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby stated this case includes the three assessment agreements that were provided <br />to the Pearson’s representative that are being reviewed and must be executed by March 14, 2022 <br />at the latest. Staff requests approval of the assessment agreements under the condition that the <br />City Attorney review them as to legal form after they are approved by the Pearsons. <br /> <br />Jeff Johnson, 14540 Bowers Drive, asked why Riverdale has to tie into Bowers. He understood <br />there is a goal to cap Bowers at Hwy. 10 but stated there is no reason for it. He expressed concern <br />with connecting to Riverdale is going to create for the neighborhood and is going to be another <br />situation where one problem is fixed but another bigger problem is created. He stated it will <br />become a bike road but that road isn’t lit, is narrow, canopied, and really dark at night. He <br />expressed concern with the additional traffic. He stated he moved to this road because it was <br />private. He suggested capping off the road going into the Pearson’s farm, make it a wide entrance <br />lane, and then on the westbound side where there is access going into the farm, close that off and <br />extend to a long deceleration lane going into Bowers. He stated that is a cheap solution that <br />wouldn’t impact Bowers Drive. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked City Engineer Westby to comment. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby replied that through the approval process, they have been working with <br />MnDot and Anoka County on all of the accesses and what would be approved by MnDot. It has <br />been through numerous plans and various versions of how it can have safe access. He stated this <br />is the arrangement that is allowable to MnDot based on their access guidelines. He stated they are <br />continuing to work with Elk River to get improvements to the west of this site that will include <br />some other potential modifications. He stated the final plat has been approved and at this point, <br />modifications would be a complete unravelling of what has been done. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the motion for this case is the agreement of the parties and <br />their portion that would be payment for the road. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby confirmed this, and added there are three assessment agreements attached <br />to the case, with cost sharing that was approved, for which approval is being requested. Upon <br />approval of the Pearson family, it will be brought back to the Council for formal approval. <br /> <br />City Council / February 22, 2022 <br />Page 32 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.