My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 02/22/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:25:43 AM
Creation date
3/10/2022 9:01:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/22/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Specht asked if the EDA budget was $85,000 and if there were other aspects of <br />the EDA budget that the Council sees individually. He stated the Council approves the EDA <br />budget and trusts the EDA will do what they deem best for the economic development of the City. <br />He stated he would be supporting it on that basis. He thought that the cohort could be a factor in <br />businesses coming to Ramsey. He asked how many of the 26 businesses on the email listing have <br />been to a meeting or had interactions in a year. <br /> <br />Mr. Turok replied he didn’t have that information in front of him but all of them have been to at <br />least one cohort meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell responded to Councilmember Riley’s concerns about the response of <br />some of the Councilmembers regarding this topic. She reminded him that the Mayor invited people <br />a year ago to disparage councilmembers and also allowed people to disparage people who came <br />up to speak publicly at these meetings and Councilmember Riley hasn’t voiced concerns before. <br />She also pointed out that there are cities who don’t pay $5,000 to the cohort but still participate so <br />paying money isn’t a requirement to benefit because other cities even outside the Anoka Area <br />Chamber are as well. She is not opposed to manufacturing and agreed with Councilmember <br />Musgrove’s suggestions to help manufacturers. She stated there aren’t hard facts about what other <br />ways this is benefiting manufacturers in the City and she was concerned over the lack concern <br />about that. She stated that dollar amount is not what should be the determining factor and questions <br />that have been presented haven’t gotten answers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that the EDA recommends it, the City spent $5,000 and <br />two Ramsey businesses got $12,000, which to him what a net positive. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied that the EDA made an uninformed decision because they didn’t <br />have the information that came forward in the last week. She repeated that the City can benefit <br />from being a part of the manufacturing cohort without paying $5,000 and City resources could be <br />used to benefit the manufacturers in ways that are unique. She thought the EDA and Council had <br />wonderful ideas to help the manufacturers and questioned why Ramsey and Anoka are the only <br />ones paying. She suggested it be matched by the other cities. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked why other cities don’t pay. <br /> <br />Mr. Turok replied some other cities have been asked and they are in the process of asking more <br />cities with the goal of expanding what is already being done. He asked Councilmember Howell <br />to give context to a question that she had said his answer was “I don’t know and I don’t care.” <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell replied the question was if Mr. LeTourneau was the sole provider of <br />services to Mr. Turok and he had replied “I don’t know and I don’t care.” She also commented on <br />the question of the EDA being fully informed and felt that was inaccurate because they didn’t have <br />the whole picture. She doubted the EDA would have been supportive of supporting cities that <br />aren’t in the Chamber of Commerce. She expressed concern with that as well as that the pipeline <br />grant was the only hard evidence of effectiveness provided. <br /> <br />City Council / February 22, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 34 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.