Laserfiche WebLink
would not be additional improvements, therefore any additional improvements that are needed for <br />the road/infrastructure would need to be funded by the school. <br />Mr. Patraw asked about impacts to the wetlands on neighboring properties in addition to the wells <br />and septic systems on adjacent properties. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he cannot answer that as he is unsure of well depths. <br />Mr. Patraw replied that to his knowledge the wells do not go down 300 feet. He asked if the well <br />water would be tested and who would be responsible for negative impacts, should that occur. <br />Motion by Commissioner Walker, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to close the public hearing. <br />Further discussion: Ryan Flagger, 16510 Yolite Street, asked if there are guidelines on the acreage <br />required for high schools. He noted that when looking online he noticed guidelines of 30 to 40 <br />acres. He believed that this parcel is too small for what PACT will need. Ms. Graw stated that <br />there have been a lot of comments from the school that more details will be forth coming and asked <br />when that would occur. She stated that it is hard to make an informed decision when there is a lot <br />more study to be done before this could continue forward. Senior Planner Anderson commented <br />that this is a conceptual review noting that there are a number of steps in platting property and <br />provided more explanation. He noted that if this moves forward to Preliminary Plat, all those <br />additional details would be provided for the proposed development. He stated that the water <br />management plans and wetland delineations would also be reviewed by the LRRWMO. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner Walker aye <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Motion Carried. <br />Commissioner Gengler closed the public hearing closed at 9:09 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked staff to provide more explanation on the requested action <br />tonight. He asked if Public/Quasi-Public would allow for a school or whether that would be a <br />conditional use. He also asked for additional details on the next steps. <br />Senior Planner Anderson stated that no formal action is necessary for the sketch plan, noting that <br />the intent is to provide feedback for the applicant. He stated that there are two proposed actions <br />before the Commission tonight, the first would be related to the requested rezoning from R- <br />1/MUSA-80 to Public/Quasi-Public. He stated that a school would be a permitted use within that <br />zoning district. He stated that the second action would be related to the requested Comprehensive <br />