Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner VanScoy asked if there has even been a situation where the Council has overturned <br />a recommendation from the Commission on a CUP. <br />Planning Technician McCann commented that he was not aware of such a case. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that perhaps over the course of time it has happened once or twice <br />but noted that it would be uncommon. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he has not experienced overturning but has seen additional <br />conditions added by the City Council. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that there is value in shortening the process but stated that <br />there is also value in having additional review by two sets of eyes. <br />City Planner Anderson commented that an applicant would still have the ability to appeal the <br />decision of the Commission and take that to the City Council. <br />Chairperson Bauer commented that he can recall a variance the Commission denied which was <br />taken to the City Council and gained approval. <br />City Planner Anderson commented that he could also recall a Home Occupation Permit that was <br />denied by the Commission and appealed to the City Council where it was approved. <br />Commissioner Dunaway asked how the process would work if the Planning Commission were to <br />approve a CUP. He asked the mechanism that would be used if the City Council did not agree <br />with the decision or wanted to add additional conditions. <br />City Planner Anderson replied that the Council could choose to actively participate in the public <br />hearing as a resident or member of the City Council. He stated that if something were approved, <br />a resident could potentially appeal the decision through the same process an applicant would have. <br />He commented that without an official appeal, the decision at the Planning Commission level <br />would be final. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that the case mentions that this was brought forward by discussion <br />at a City Council worksession. He asked if the Council supports this action. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that generically he believes there is support but believed that <br />direction came about before he joined the Council. He noted that this action tonight would still <br />need to be approved by the City Council, therefore that consideration will be provided. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to recommend that City <br />Council introduce Ordinance #22-08 Amending City Code Chapter 117-51 Regarding Conditional <br />Use Permits. <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br />Planning Commission/ January 27, 2022 <br />Page 18 of 22 <br />