My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/16/2022 10:27:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/08/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Johnson stated they needed to go back and fix the problem instead of changing the Comp Plan <br /> to please the developers. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if they are required to change the Comp Plan to accommodate a <br /> development. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied no. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if it is correct that the Comprehensive Plan had to be changed so it <br /> would match the zoning that was set for that area. But they weren't required to change the Comp <br /> Plan. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied that is a separate question because the zoning is supposed to conform <br /> to the Comprehensive Plan, if the Comp Plan is changed, the zoning has to be modified to be in <br /> conformity with it. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if the Council was legally obligated to make the changes or could <br /> they have voted to not make them. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied at some point the two would have to conform and the higher level is <br /> the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if there was a timeframe required. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he believed it was within a reasonable period of time, noting the City <br /> can be sued for not conforming. <br /> Councilmember Howell asked if they could be sued by this developer for not conforming. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied he didn't want to speculate. <br /> Councilmember Riley stated his understanding of why they needed to have this new area of the <br /> Comp Plan is because of the wetlands in this area; the density developed would be below what the <br /> Comp Plan and Met Council calls for. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied there are several factors that <br /> play into the net density calculations. Certain areas can be omitted from the overall project. What <br /> the developers have presented and been approved for Preliminary Plat meets straight zoning <br /> guidelines. Once they put their plans together, the net density was calculated and falls below the <br /> three to four units per acre required per the Comp Plan. Right now, the Comp Plan and zoning <br /> don't match the best, which is a process that needs to be gone through. Ideally, if a developer <br /> comes in it can meet the Plan but in this case, it couldn't after all those factors were considered. <br /> The tool is to create this very specific area known as the Trott Brook Planning Area and <br /> implementing this less than three units per acre on City services. <br /> City Council/February 22, 2022 <br /> Page 12 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.