Laserfiche WebLink
To whom it may concern, <br /> I am writing in opposition to the proposed rezoning of the property located at the intersection of 161 S,Ave <br /> and Variolite Street adjacent to Central Park. There are a number of reasons why the rezoning of this <br /> parcel should not be allowed, Among them traffic and safety,inconsistency of zoning for this use and <br /> environmental concerns. I would like you to also consider disruption of use that will be inflicted upon the <br /> adjoining and nearby residents. <br /> I have looked to the 2 other schools in the City of Ramsey to see what similar areas zoned for this use <br /> look like. I was unable to get complete statistics on the other schools in short notice.My estimates are <br /> closest estimates based on calls to the district,the schools and internet resources.I have attached arial <br /> layouts from the 2 already constructed schools and the proposed PACT school. <br /> Both Brookside and Ramsey have access point only along County Highway 5 also known as Nowthen <br /> Blvd. Both schools have access which allow safe access in and out for busses. PACT has 2 access point <br /> along a residential street.This access is contemplated for busses to enter and exit the parcel within feet of <br /> a residential driveway.A potential for a secondary access thru an adjoining parcel is not guaranteed. <br /> Even if the access is obtained thru the adjoining parcel to Variolite,that road is also not designed to <br /> handle this volume of traffic. In addition,there is nothing to stop any traffic from the school from turning <br /> back onto the residential road of 16 Is,Ave NW. Both Brookside and Ramsey have access direct to <br /> County Highway 5,a County Highway designed for this type of use. PACT currently has residential <br /> street and possible a larger street neither designed for or likely to provide reasonable sightlines for the <br /> incoming and exiting traffic. PACT will need to have traffic from the school proceed through a number <br /> of smaller roads before coming to a collector street. <br /> The residential street of 16111 Ave NW cannot handle the increased traffic unless it is expanded <br /> significantly.A cost that would not be necessary but for the rezoning of this parcel. Currently the roads <br /> that may become secondary roads for PACT traffic,Xenolith St and 1591h Avenue are likely to see <br /> increased volume of traffic and safety concerns if this parcel is rezoned. Will the city be adding <br /> sidewalks to these roads so that those residents can be safe on their street?Will the cost for this <br /> improvement be borne by the taxpayers or the applicant? It is unlikely these roads would need <br /> improvement of this type but for increased traffic. The current schools in the city have been located on <br /> roads designed for this this type of traffic and the greatest possible safety they still face challenges. This <br /> parcel does not have the benefit of direct access to a collector street thereby pushing the burden of the <br /> traffic and the lack of safe road conditions onto the local residents and the cost of redesigning these roads <br /> to the taxpayers. A traffic study needs to look at this as well. <br /> Another difference that should be pointed out is that since PACT will be a high school there needs to be <br /> cons <br /> iderations for students driving to the school. This is an additional traffic source not seen in <br /> elementary schools that should be receiving students via bussing and walking. PACT services statewide <br /> students not just local students so traffic from parent drop off may be increased based on lack of <br /> availability of bussing. This means additional traffic in the form of individual cars.The resulting traffi c <br /> will come in the form of twice a day traffic at the beginning and end of the day as well as sporadic traffic <br /> all day five days a week. It will also include special events and sporting events consisting of spectators <br /> and visitors these event tend to be larger more frequent and generate <br /> In addition to the traffic from the proposed school and possible church information from the agenda <br /> contemp lates expansion of the park use that will also increase traffi c. No study has yet looked at the <br /> current expanding traffic from Central Park let alone expanding traffic from the park a new school and a <br /> church. The proposed church will also have traffic impacts both on Sundays and possible for daily mass <br /> as is advertised on their current website. What happens if all of the uses on the residential street of 1 6 1 m <br />