Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> Memorandum <br /> d Zportallon <br /> 11th*W <br /> lallon <br /> Subject: INFORMATION: Guidance on Date: September 25, 2007 <br /> Off-Premise Changeable Message Signs <br /> Original signed by: In Reply Refer To: <br /> From: Gloria M. Shepherd HEPR-20 <br /> Associate Administrator for <br /> Planning, Environment, and Realty <br /> To: Division Administrators <br /> Attn: Division Realty Professionals <br /> Purpose <br /> The purpose of this memorandum is to provide guidance to Division offices concerning off- <br /> premises changeable message signs adjacent to routes subject to requirements for effective <br /> control under the Highway Beautification Act(HBA) codified at 23 U.S.C. 131. It clarifies <br /> the application of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) July 17, 1996 memorandum <br /> on this subject. This office may provide further guidance in the future as a result of <br /> additional information received through safety research, stakeholder input, and other sources. <br /> Pursuant to 23 CFR 750.705, a State DOT is required to obtain FHWA Division approval of <br /> any changes to its laws, regulations, and procedures to implement the requirements of its <br /> outdoor advertising control program. A State DOT should request and Division offices <br /> should provide a determination as to whether the State should allow off-premises changeable <br /> electronic variable message signs (CEVMS) adjacent to controlled routes, as required by our <br /> delegation of responsibilities under 23 CFR 750.7050). Those Divisions that already have <br /> formally approved CEVMS use on HBA controlled routes, as well as those that have not yet <br /> issued a decision, should re-evaluate their position in light of the following considerations. <br /> The decision of the Division should be based upon a review and approval of a State's <br /> affirmation and policy that: (1)is consistent with the existing Federal/State Agreement(FSA) <br /> for the particular State, and (2) includes but is not limited to consideration of requirements <br /> associated with the duration of message, transition time, brightness, spacing, and location, <br /> submitted for FHWA approval, that evidence reasonable and safe standards to regulate such <br /> signs are in place for the protection of the motoring public. Proposed laws, regulations, <br /> and procedures that would allow permitting CEVMS subject to acceptable criteria (as <br /> described below) do not violate a prohibition against "intermittent" or "flashing" or <br /> "moving" lights as those terms are used in the various FSAs that have been entered into <br /> during the 1960s and 1970s. <br />