My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/14/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2021
>
Agenda - Council - 12/14/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 3:20:05 PM
Creation date
3/22/2022 2:30:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/14/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1424
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented she wasn't sure that is stalling projects, to the <br /> Commission's point, given that there is revenue, it just seems like progress isn't happening when <br /> some things are getting done while other things on the CIP keep getting delayed over and over. <br /> Finance Director Lund asked Councilmember Musgrove if she was okay with the projects being <br /> slated for 2022. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove confirmed this. <br /> 2.04: Consider Soliciting Quotes for Park Improvements at the Proposed Trott Brook <br /> Crossing (Sotarra) Subdivision <br /> City Administrator Ulrich commented that Councilmembers Howell and Musgrove requested that <br /> this item be brought to a Work Session to discuss direction to Parks and Assistant Public Works <br /> Superintendent Riverblood to get three quotes for a complete renovation and restoration of the <br /> farmhouse and barns that are a part of the Sotarra Project that will be given to the City as park <br /> dedication. <br /> Councilmember Howell commented that the EDA has been discussing the cost of a basic <br /> renovation of the Ramsey Town Hall. Estimates were around $100,000. Regarding the historic <br /> buildings, she expected estimates would be much higher, so if the developer didn't give them to <br /> the City, he would have to pay for demolition. She didn't want tax payers to get stuck with a <br /> significant and unexpected cost and thought it would be nice to get the information up front to <br /> have an idea of what it would cost to take on buildings that need significant work. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove agreed with Councilmember Howell that the rehab for the donated <br /> buildings is going to cost the City. She asked for confirmation that the donation decreases the park <br /> dedication fee for the developer. <br /> Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied the developers are not getting <br /> any credit for park dedication but for the land that is high ground against land dedication. He noted <br /> 50% park dedication was credited for all the land that was underneath the powerlines and there <br /> was no consideration for the buildings. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the park dedication fee pays for the building rehab. <br /> Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied that the pro*ect probably has <br /> merit. His early estimates were if there were 3,000 square feet of building to renovate, including <br /> fire suppression and electrical, and if it was $100 per square foot that's about $300,000. He noted <br /> the final phases of the proposed Trott Brook Crossing would pay in excess of$300,000 in park <br /> dedication toward the latter phases and better estimate numbers would be needed. He has asked <br /> the developer for access to the buildings for analysis, noting that two months ago, a home <br /> inspection was ordered on the dwelling, which was just received. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented she has a copy of the Municipal Plaza North probable <br /> construction costs. She stated if something could be put together that is similar for probable <br /> City Council Work Session /November 23, 2021 <br /> Page 12 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.