Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION #21-352 <br /> APPROVING YOUTH FIRST COMMUNITY OF PROMISE LEASE AGREEMENT <br /> WHEREAS, Youth First Community of Promise has leased City property located at <br /> 6701 Hwy 10 NW since; and <br /> WHEREAS, the current Leases for the east 4,820 SF of space in the front of 6701 Hwy <br /> 10 NW and the adjacent Vacant Lot terminate on December 31, 2021 and Youth First <br /> Community of Promise has asked the City to extend those leases; and <br /> WHEREAS, the current Leases for the east 4,820 SF of space in the front of 6701 Hwy <br /> 10 NW and the adjacent Vacant Lot terminate on December 31, 2021 and Youth First <br /> Community of Promise has asked the City to extend those leases; and <br /> WHEREAS, the City of Ramsey has provided previous leases to with Youth First with <br /> favorable terms intentionally to support their mission and work. The terms of the proposed two <br /> lease of the East 4,820 SF of 6701 and the Adjacent Vacant Land are as follows: <br /> - January 1, 2022 — December 31, 2022 - $1.00 annually <br /> - January 1, 2023 — December 31, 2023 - $1.00 annually <br /> WHEREAS, the City Attorney has reviewed the proposed Lease Agreement combining <br /> the East 4,280 SF of the front of 6701 Hwy 10 and the adjacent Vacant Lot and current Leases <br /> for the east 4,820 SF of space in the front of 6701 Hwy 10 NW and the adjacent Vacant Lot has <br /> has found the terms to be consistent with previous leases with Youth First except for the duration <br /> being shortened to 2 years to allow for the RALF properties to be sold. <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF RAMSEY,ANOKA <br /> COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> 1) That the City of Ramsey authorizes execution of the Lease Agreement with Youth First <br /> Community of Promise for the East 4,280 SF of the front of 6701 Hwy 10 NW and the <br /> adjacent Vacant Lot; subject to City Attorney review. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br />