Laserfiche WebLink
In reviewing allocation information,please note that while all subdivisions may participate in the Settlements, not all <br /> subdivisions are eligible to receive direct payments. To promote efficiency in the use of abatement funds and avoid <br /> administratively burdensome disbursements that would be too small to add a meaningful abatement response, certain smaller <br /> subdivisions do not automatically receive a direct allocation.However,participation by such subdivisions will help maximize <br /> the amount of abatement funds being paid in the Settlements, including those going to counties, cities,parishes, and other <br /> larger subdivisions in their communities. <br /> In some states there will be a proposed state-subdivision agreement that is in the process of being adopted by subdivisions.Any <br /> questions concerning the status or terms of the state-subdivision agreement, allocation statute, and/or statutory trust in your <br /> state, if applicable, can be directed to the Attorney General's Office. <br /> You may be contacted by the Attorney General's Office with additional information regarding the allocation of settlement <br /> funds in Minnesota. Subdivisions with representation can expect information from their attorneys as well. We encourage you to <br /> review all materials and to follow up with any questions. The terms of these Settlements are complex and we want to be sure <br /> you have all the information you need to make your participation decision. <br /> The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) is participating on an advisory panel that will make recommendations for a <br /> statewide framework for the allocation and use of funds to be received from national opioid lawsuits. The plan <br /> presented would override the default allocation plans derived from the national litigation where direct payments <br /> would be sent to individual cities with populations over 10,000. <br /> LMC Key Points to note: <br /> • Cities and counties have until Jan. 2, 2022, to sign onto a settlement agreement negotiated against a <br /> Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Participant in the national litigation. The more political subdivisions that sign,the <br /> more money Minnesota will receive. <br /> • The goal of the advisory panel is to have a statewide allocation plan agreed upon and incorporated into the <br /> settlement terms. States across the country are developing unique allocation plans and Minnesota's advisory panel <br /> is reviewing all for ideas and templates. <br /> •Any Opioid Settlement Funds received will be restricted to remediation and abatement uses. The counties' plan <br /> will allow for direct funding of programs (primarily public health and human services) that fit within these uses. <br /> • One reason provided for county specific funding is that smaller amounts divided among numerous local <br /> governments would not have as great an impact on the opioid crisis as larger blocks of money. <br /> •Alternative allocation plans are being created and will be reviewed by the advisory panel. Input is needed from <br /> individual cities on whether direct city funding versus county funding is preferable, and on any suggested terms for <br /> city access and administration of Opioid Settlement Funds <br /> Why City Should Participate <br /> The Attorney General's notice listed the following reasons to participate: <br /> A vast majority of states have joined the Settlements, and attorneys for many subdivisions have already announced <br /> support for them. For example, the Plaintiffs'Executive Committee, charged with leading the litigation on behalf of <br /> more than 31 000 cities, counties and others against the opioid industry, and consolidated in the national <br /> multi-district litigation ("MDL')pending before Judge Dan Aaron Polster in the Northern District of Ohio, <br /> recommends participation in these Settlements. <br /> Subdivision participation is strongly encouraged,for the following reasons: <br /> First, the amounts to be paid under the Settlements, while insufficient to abate the epidemic fully, will allow state <br /> and local governments to commence with meaningful change designed to curb opioid addiction, overdose and <br /> death; <br /> Second, time is of the essence. The opioid epidemic continues to devastate communities around the country and it is <br /> critical that the funds begin to flow to allow governments to address the epidemic in their communities as soon as <br />