Laserfiche WebLink
Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the City is not allowed to recommend or require <br /> specific consultants to be used. She stated that the City could complete its own study and choose <br /> its own consultant for that. <br /> Commissioner Walker commented that the consultant that completed the traffic study is now an <br /> inactive company as of October. He stated that this report was also used for the Hunt project, but <br /> specifically states it is for 270 single family homes. He stated that when you add both <br /> developments, there will be a 28 percent increase in homes. He stated that the study was done the <br /> week of July 251h during COVID when school is not in session and only during certain times. He <br /> stated that he spoke with other consultants that observe for two hours rather than one hour in order <br /> to obtain better information. He stated that these two developments will have an impact on an <br /> intersection that is already dangerous, CR 5 and Ramsey Boulevard. He stated that until that safety <br /> issue can be solved, he did not believe additional development should occur. He acknowledged <br /> that it has been said that the Commission does not have an option but to pass this, but the City <br /> Council should protect the residents of Ramsey. He stated that in 2020, at a public hearing, the <br /> developer was asked why he wanted smaller lots. It was stated that people want smaller lots. He <br /> provided statistics on home sales of one acre or larger lots in Ramsey. He stated that if over 300 <br /> lots one acre or larger in size have been sold in the last three years in Ramsey, that should show <br /> that people want larger lots. He stated that many residents spoke tonight that they were not noticed <br /> when the massive rezoning was completed in 2011. He stated that not one resident has come <br /> forward stating that they were notified of the zoning changes that occurred in 2011. He believed <br /> that the rezoning was done too fast and too recklessly. He stated that this current proposal does <br /> not meet the proper zoning on two parcels, which means that the request cannot go through. He <br /> commented that he believes that the Commission and Council should not rezone the two parcels <br /> and that an investigation should occur on the 2011 rezoning. He noted that anyone involved in the <br /> 2011 rezoning should be terminated from their position on staff and/or the Council. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that staff can verify with the City Attorney after the <br /> meeting. She stated that all the information was sent to the City Attorney and the map shows the <br /> property rezoned. She stated that the list of residents was notified and the minutes from the <br /> meeting shows residents that spoke at the meeting in 2011. She stated that staff has verified the <br /> information, which is public information. <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked if the rezoning completed in 2011 was a blanket rezoning to match the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that each property was mentioned separately in the <br /> meeting minutes at the public hearing in 2011. She stated that according to the City Attorney and <br /> zoning map, the property is zoned appropriately. She stated that the land is also shown with that <br /> zoning in the 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plans. <br /> Commissioner Walker provided additional details on the two parcels he believes were not rezoned <br /> appropriately. <br /> Planning Commission/ October 28, 2021 <br /> Page 8 of 23 <br />