Laserfiche WebLink
a different tract. He asked if the projects could run on different tracts for a length of time. He <br /> asked if this could move forward to a point of waiting for an answer from PACT and the direction <br /> that will take. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan stated that PACT has made it clear that they are on a <br /> fast track, and they are aware there are other concepts on this site. He believed that more <br /> information will be known over the next month and anticipates that PACT should have an idea on <br /> whether the site would work for them or not by the next EDA meeting. He stated that if PACT <br /> states that the site will not work for them, staff could perhaps work on a purchase agreement with <br /> Java prior to the next EDA meeting. He stated that PACT had not accounted for Veterans Drive <br /> or the stormwater pond and therefore the site is very tight for the use PACT desired. <br /> Member Steffen stated that the EDA could wait a month if the developer is in agreement. He <br /> stated that it appears the EDA favors the retail project, even if PACT does have interest in the site. <br /> Member Howell stated that they are both good ideas. She recognized the convenience it would <br /> bring to have the high school location near the existing PACT school. She stated that if this site <br /> does not work for PACT, she would still like to see PACT remain in Ramsey. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated that alternate layout options were reviewed and discussed with <br /> PACT. He stated that based on the fast track that PACT is on, the City directed them to other land <br /> currently owned by the City as that could be fast moving. He stated that there are other sites south <br /> of highway 10 that would fit a high school campus as well, along with land near Central Park. He <br /> recognized that it is important to try to help PACT find land within the City of Ramsey. <br /> Member Riley stated that from an EDA standpoint and economic development, phase one would <br /> make sense to move forward. He stated that they could also continue to work with PACT with the <br /> understanding that PACT is on a fast track and there may be somewhat of a delay over the next <br /> month until there is clarity. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan confirmed that is the direction he was looking for. He <br /> stated that he would like to play it by ear to see what happens and transpires between now and the <br /> November meeting. He stated that if PACT moves on from this site, he would like the ability to <br /> begin working on a purchase agreement with Java. He stated that he agrees that the perspective of <br /> the EDA and Council can sometimes be different. He asked if the developer is comfortable with <br /> that direction. <br /> Mr. Krogh stated that he would love to move forward with a purchase agreement for phase one <br /> and an option for phase two. He recognized that it would still need to go forward to the City <br /> Council. <br /> Chairperson Cords summarized that the EDA likes the idea of some level of progress towards <br /> phase one while the City gives a few weeks for PACT to identify their path. <br /> Economic Development Authority/ October 14, 2021 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br />