Agenda - Council - 03/22/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Email received 03/09/2022 Mr. Anderson, Mr. Hagen, Mr. McCann, Mayor Kuzma and Councilmembers: RE: 6025 177t" Lane NW, (Peacekeepers) I just wanted to express the deep frustration and dismissive lack of neighbor concerns Council relayed last night. We felt our legitimate concerns were not acknowledged and that Council did not look at this from an unbiased factual point. Applicant has legitimately failed conditions of his HOP Level I; but yet City Staff and Council have still failed to address those facts. Shouldn't Applicant have to comply with his Level I before moving forward with a Level II? The meeting seemed to deviate from the facts. 1. Commercial business in a residential area 2. Failure to comply with Level I, stating on-line only (see HOP I Conditions) 3. Safety of small children, dogs playing, and people walking; Applicant's wife and clients drive too fast for the neighborhood. The gun and building safety is a given. 4. The neighborhood is unlit, no street lights, outskirt, residential area It's no longer a small business as the Applicant validates. Council's own statements that HOP's are to help small businesses get started with the hope for them to move to a more commercial setting. This amended HOP level II request and it's original Level I HOP do the neighbors a great injustice and the City a great disservice. Cordially, Kelly Schmidt Note: We would ask for these less invasive, neighbor impact conditions at a minimal. 1. The business be put on a 6 month trial period, if violations are met and corrected, inspections passed, then reapply for an amended Level II 2. The business be limited to standard business hours (8-5 M-F) Item 3 noncompliance 3. One Saturday a month 8-1 pm (ex. 1st Saturday) 4. Per Planning Commission, 6 car parking at pole building 5. Appointments could be outside the scope above, as only one vehicle at a time Attachments: Applicant's conditional HOP Level I Address petition to Deny HOP Level II