Laserfiche WebLink
opportunity to learn more about the proposed project, ask questions, and/or raise concerns in a less formal setting <br /> than the official public hearing. The comments from this Open House are attached to the case. <br /> The Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on this proposal on February 24, 2022.Numerous written <br /> and verbal comments were received(all attached to the case,written comments as one attachment,verbal comments <br /> are reflected in the draft meeting minutes). The Environmental Policy Board(EPB) also reviewed this proposal on <br /> February 28, 2022 where additional written and verbal comments were received(again, all attached to this case in <br /> similar fashion as outlined previously). <br /> The City Council considered the Sketch Plan,Zoning Amendment, and Comprehensive Plan Amendment on March <br /> 81 2022,where additional public comments were received. Ultimately,the City Council approved the <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment and introduced Ordinance#22-15 to rezone the Subject Property to <br /> Public/Quasi-Public. Per the City's Charter, the Ordinance is now eligible for adoption. <br /> Alternatives <br /> Alternative 1: Adopt Ordinance#22-15 to rezone eighteen(18) acres of the Subject Property from R-1 Residential <br /> (MUSA) - 80 to Public/Quasi-Public, contingent upon approval of a Preliminary Plat for PACT. Rezoning a <br /> portion of the Subject Property to Public/Quasi-Public is necessary if PACT Charter School is to proceed with <br /> engineering plans for site development. The contingency provides some assurance that if PACT for some reason no <br /> longer pursued this site, the zoning designation would'revert'back to R-1 Residential (MUSA) - 80. <br /> Alternative 2: Do not adopt Ordinance#22-15. Should the Ordinance not be adopted,the zoning would remain as <br /> R-1 Residential (MUSA) - 80 and the PACT project would not be permissible on the Subject Property. <br /> Development of civil engineering plans, along with various studies related to traffic,noise, lights, etc.,will allow <br /> the City to review if the project meets the standards of City Code. If not, or if PACT does not implement necessary <br /> mitigation measures based on the various studies,the project could still be denied. <br /> Funding Source: <br /> All costs associated with this request of the responsibility of the Applicant. <br /> Recommendation: <br /> The Planning Commission,by a 3-1 vote,recommended that the City Council approve the Comprehensive Plan <br /> Amendment and Zoning Amendment, contingent upon approval of a Preliminary Plat. This would allow the project <br /> to move to the next step and develop the detailed plans (and studies)necessary to address many of the concerns <br /> raised. <br /> The Environmental Policy Board,by a 5-0 vote,recommended that the City Council deny the Comprehensive Plan <br /> Amendment and the Zoning Amendment. <br /> Outcome/Action: <br /> Motion to waive the Charter requirement to read the Ordinance aloud and adopt Ordinance#22-15 rezoning the <br /> western eighteen(18) acres of the Subject Property to Public/Quasi-Public contingent upon approval of a <br /> Preliminary Plat for PACT. <br /> Roll Call Vote: <br /> Councilmember Heineman <br /> Councilmember Musgrove <br /> Councilmember Specht <br /> Councilmember Howell <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff <br /> Councilmember Riley <br /> Mayor Kuzma <br />