My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/22/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 03/22/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:27:31 PM
Creation date
3/23/2022 10:56:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/22/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
765
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Musgrove commented she isn't hopeful based on public discussion. She stated <br /> that would delay it and drag out the opportunity to get it before the voters. She thought it was too <br /> personal for some Charter Commission members so the petition would be the easiest way. <br /> Councilmember Riley asked if she thought the Councilmember would be too personal. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied yes, she didn't think they saw the same issue with it or valued <br /> the same position. <br /> Councilmember Heineman commented his preference would be to put it on a referendum but asked <br /> if they could get it on a referendum if it is delayed 150 days. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich replied the ballot question has to be decided by August, for the general <br /> election, so it would be tight. It could also be on a special election for a cost. <br /> Councilmember Howell commented if they are going the route of the Charter and there is hostility <br /> and the Chair of the Charter Commission thinks it's dead on arrival, then they would have to go <br /> back to the petition route and collect signatures in time for the general election to not have an extra <br /> expenditure. <br /> Councilmember Heineman suggested they should pursue all of the above options but not limit <br /> themselves. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich stated the recommendation to the Charter coming back to the Council <br /> is the most risky in terms of a timeline being extended to the next general election. He asked what <br /> is the most expedient way for the Council to lock in a referendum question, and is it the passing <br /> of an ordinance which could open the door to going right to the referendum. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied the quickest way is to have it come directly from the Charter <br /> Commission. Otherwise, pass the ordinance and start the process. <br /> Councilmember Heineman commented regardless, it needs to come from the Charter Commission <br /> to the City Council and asked why they don't just pass the ordinance and even if they wait the 150 <br /> days, it could still be added to the ballot. <br /> Mayor Kuzma asked if it has to be a 7-0 vote from the Council. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied the Charter Commission could approve it but it would come back to <br /> the Council and then could go to the voters. If the Charter Commission suggests a change, then <br /> the Council could decide which of the two options they would put in front of the voters. <br /> Mayor Kuzma asked what happens when it comes back to the Council. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied it would come back to the Council either way, but if the Charter <br /> Commission proposes the ordinance, they wouldn't have to go through that, it's much quicker, and <br /> it is in the Charter once it's adopted and is a way of avoiding a vote. <br /> City Council Work Session /March 8, 2022 <br /> Page 10 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.