Laserfiche WebLink
O~mand arriving on it. Such a situation would result in long que'ues ~nd extensive delay~, <br />or diversion to alternate routes. <br /> <br />Analysis and Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />Each intersection was analyzed by the criteria listed above. The signai timings have been <br />optimized fbr the sign.Aized iatersections since this would provMe the best operations for <br />each scenario, including the Existing, The 2005 and 2007 analysis year scenarios utilize <br />the current roadway layout. This eun'ent layout has five key intersections or' study. The <br />rcsutts or'the operational analysis for 2005 and 2007 are shown i.n Tables 5 and 6. The <br />I3aild conditiot~ is the baseline volumes with only the Pulte development traffic. The Furl <br />/3~li[~[ condition is thc baseline volumes with the Puite Development, Town Center I, trod <br />the Superstore. <br /> <br />Table 5:2005 Oper:~tionnl Analysis .... <br />Intersection and Traffic Control Scenario Peak Hour IntersectiOn Maximum Delay- <br />, Delay~-LOS LOS-v/e~ <br />jArmstrong B I vd & T H 101169 Existing AM '26.8-C 89.1- F-0.95 <br /> .5'~g,~alized PM 20.0-C 62.7-E-0,82 <br />[Armstrong Bird & [ndustt~ Ave NW Existing AM N/A 10.9-B-0.18 <br />~ L.D.,'ign~t!ized ~ PM I i .7-B-0.12 <br />~Armstrong Bird & Alpine Drive NW Existing AM N/A [3.0-B-0.14 <br /> <br />', ~, tL~'lgtttttL, ed P~I 17,0-C-0, [ 8 <br />/Xlpine I)rivc NW & TH 10/169 ~ Ex/sting AM N/A 19.9-C-0.59 <br />[ Unsi~mdi:ed PM 51.4-F-0.57 <br /> <br /> Drive NW & Nutria Street NW Existing. <br /> <br />~l)elny in sccomls per vehicle **Maximum delay, LOS. <br /> <br />PM <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />9J)-A-0,03 <br />9. t -A-O~04 <br /> <br />and v/c ~-atio on any approach and/or movement <br /> <br />Based on thc analysis of existing conditions, thc intersection of Alpine Drive NW and TH <br />It) operates at with an unacceptable level of delay and level of service on the Alpine <br />Drive approach. Signalizationwould bring all the movements at the intersection to LOS <br />D or above, however with the low volume on Alpine Drive, the intersection would likely <br />not meet signal warrants. <br /> <br />The intersection of TH l 0 and Armstrong Boulevard also experiences poor level of <br />service on specific movements, The em'rent configuration of traftic lanes southbound <br />does not provide enough lanes for the high volume oFtuming vehicles. An additional <br />southbound le£t tta'n lane in addition to the cun'ent thzxu'left lane would provide enough <br />capacity tbr tlze traffic and bring the LOS for the movement to D or above. All other <br />intersections analyzed perform well under two-way stop control. <br /> <br />?tdle Home,y Deveiopmem E',4 W <br />7'~'q[)?c [mpac[ ,5't'ud? <br />C'iO~ (?/' RamsC]4 .4noka CounO,. Minne.s'ola <br /> <br /> page ] 6 q/'24 <br />Prepared by: <br />Bolt'on & .',l&n/¢, hw <br /> <br />121 <br /> <br /> <br />