Laserfiche WebLink
to raise the level ot'servke to D or above tbr all the movements, the intersection should <br />be signalized and north and south left turn lanes should be added. <br /> <br />The two other intersections along Armstrong perfb~va vet'3, poorly under the Build and <br />F'u/l Buikt scenarios. The intersections with industry and TH 10 require a large volta'ne <br />o~' traffic to travel through them and will require major reconstructiom Anrmtrong at. <br />Industry will require sigmalization and the addition of through lanes and mrn lanes. <br />Armstrong at TH I 0 would either require a slx-lane divided highway fbr TH 10 with a <br />triple left southbound from Armstrong to eastbound TH 10 or the construction cfa full <br />interchange with access ramps to TH 10. <br /> <br />Thc traffic control and lanes that are required for the 2007 scenm'ios are included as <br />Figure 9. With the mitigated measures as ontlined above, the resulting measures of <br />efii:ctiveness are outlined in 'Fable 7. <br /> <br />;F~tbl-c 7:2007 Mitigated Operational Analysis <br />httcrsectio, & Traffic Control Scenario Peak Hour Intersection Maximum Delay- <br /> Delay*-LOS LOS-v/c** <br /> Build <br /> <br />Armsrr(mg BN'd ~ TH 10/169 <br /> Signah~ed <br /> <br />Armstrong Blvd & lndustt? Ave NW <br /> <br /> SignaiTzed <br /> <br />Armstrong Blvd &. Alpine Drive NW <br /> <br /> L'nsignatized <br /> <br />Alpine Drive NW & TH 10/}69 <br /> S(gnah'zed <br /> <br />Alpine Drive NW & Nutria Street <br /> Unsignaliaed <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM ' <br /> <br />AM <br />PM ' <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />,;o. <br /> <br />23.4-C <br /> <br />46.6-D-0.89 <br />52.0-D-0.84 <br /> <br />34.3-C 54.4-D-0.92 <br />66. I-E 125.0-F-1.13 <br />29.6-C 62,6-E-0.92 <br />20.4-C 37.0-D-0.82 <br /> <br />58.5-E <br />61.3-E <br /> <br />$.9-A <br />6. I-A <br /> <br />6.0-A <br />8. I-A <br /> <br />Z4=A <br />9.2-A <br /> <br />7.8-A <br />9.5-A <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />N/A . <br /> <br />78.5-E-I.08 <br />96.54'-1.15 <br /> <br />' 9.8-A-0.34 <br /> 9.5-A-0.34 <br /> <br />11.7-B-0.44 <br />t4.3-B~0.57 <br /> <br />16.6-8-0,6 l <br />23,0-C-0,66 <br /> <br />25.1-C-0,74 <br />41.0-D-0.8 I' <br /> <br />9.6,A-0.05 <br />i0, l-B-0.05 <br /> <br />9.&A-0,07 I <br />l 0. I-B-0.0$ <br /> <br />*Delay in seconds per vehicle **Maximum delay, LOS, and v/c muo on any approach an~(or movement <br /> <br />With the addition of the Superstore and Town Centre' 1, the intersection of Industry and <br />Armstrong fails under signalization in 2007, even with'the mitigation measures as <br />designated on ?igure 9. Without fl~e Superstore and only Town Center l added to the <br />Pulte Devetopment traffic, the intersection does not fail. <br /> <br />Puile bfomex Development L:A <br />D'a/fic [mpact Sludy <br />C'i/y qf Rama'e,y, ,,lnoka (.'O~trlly, Minne,s'ota <br /> <br /> page I8 of 24 <br />Prepared by: <br />Bolton & Menk, [nc <br /> <br />123 <br /> <br /> <br />