Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/06/2005

Home

August 25, 2005 -- Page 3 Certified General Real Property Appraiser Scott Ruppert, entitled: "Real Estate Value Impact Study, Issue: Do communication towers have an impact on the market value of residential properties in close proximity." The Ruppert study analyzed, three study areas in Stillwater, Golden Valley, and New Hope, Minn., and concluded there was no measurable difference in the market value of properties there. After a public hearing, the city council denied Minnesota Towers's re- quest. It found the proposed tower would diminish property values. Minnesota Towers sued, arguing, under the Telecommunications Act, the city could not deny its application on the available evidence regarding property values. DECISION: Judgment in favor of the city. Based on the information before the city council, the determination that property values would be diminished significantly by the presence of a 195- foot tower was based on substantial evidence in the record. The city relied on a petition signed by 72 citizens in'the area neighbbring the proposed site. The citizens stated that they believed the proposed telecom- munications tower would lower their property values. The citizens based their opinions on aesthetic concerns and on perceived health concerns associated with telecommunications towers, as enumerated in several published articles related to health issues associated with radio frequency exposure. Further, the record contained the opinion of a mortgage loan officer that a I95-foot tower would have a negative impact. The Ruppert study was not recent and its conclusions were based on places that were not similar to the Duluth area. Additionally, the legitimate lay opinions of neighboring landowners were valid evidence of the diminished market val- ues. Finally, although the city could not consider the 'environmental effects of radio frequency emissions in deciding whether to allow placement of a telecom- munications tower, this did not prevent the marketplace from considering health concerns as a factor in assessing the potential diminished market value of property near a 195-foot tower. see also: Voicestream Minneapolis Inc. v. St. Croix County, 342 F. 3d 818 (2003). xee also: American Tower LP v. City of Huntsville, 295 F. 3d 1203 (2002). Spot Zoning -- City allows property owner to continue historical use Property owner plans to operate retail business in residential area Citation: Larkin v. The City of Medina, Court of Appeals of Washington, Div. /, No, 54764-0-[ (2005) WASHINGTON (07/05/05) -- Lee applied for a conditional use permit to oper- ate a coffee shop, delicatessen, and dry cleaner in the Medina store. From 1910 to 2000, the Medina store sold foodstuffs and other goods. The city's Compre- hensive Plan identified the building and the store as an important part of the city's history that should be preserved. 2005 Quinlan Publishing Group. Any reproduction is prohibited. For more information please call (617) 542-0048. 197