Laserfiche WebLink
Z.B. <br /> <br />September 25, 2005 -- Page 5 <br /> <br /> and maintain a dune, the berm was in actuality an illegal fence. The court ruled <br /> in favor of Kassin. <br /> Bubis appealed, arguing a fence did not have to be made of iron, wood, or <br />other typical fencing material to make it a fence.' <br />DECISION: Reversed. <br /> Kassin's berm satisfied the definition of "fence." <br /> A fence was a barrier intended to prevent escape or intrusion or to mark <br />a boundary. No definition of "fence" restricted it to a certain type of mate- <br />rial. As a matter of common sense, a fence was defined primarily by its <br />function. In fact, courts have found rows of trees by themselves constitute <br />"fences." <br /> The berm was a partition separating Kassin's property from the street. Kassin <br />testified, in addition to winterizing his property, he wanted to ensure his pri- <br />vacy and generally deter trespassing. He essentially constructed a privacy <br />fence made of sand and trees that shielded Kassin from the invasive gaze of <br />neighbors and other passers-by. <br /> Kassin's mound of sand, topped with a row of trees, was at least 14-feet tall <br />-- nearly two-and-one-half times the permitted fence height. This established a <br />"towering presence" along the street. Also, its placement between Kassin's <br />property and the street and neighboring lots showed its function as a fence. <br /> Regardless of Whether the structure was a dune, it was also a fence. By <br />choosing to erect a fence that had the elements of a dune, whether in an attempt <br />to avoid the local restrictions on fence height or for some other reason, Kassin <br />merely subjected himself to an additional set of state regulations. <br />see also: Wilson v. Handley, 97 Cal. App.4th 1301 (2002). <br />see also: Dowdell v. Bloomquist, 847 A.2d 827 (2004). <br /> <br />Ordinance -- Neighbors sue to stop new public school '. <br />Court finds board of education has ultimate say on school location <br />Citation: Alves v. Board of Education for the City of Guntersville, Court of <br />Civil Appeals of Alabama, No. 2040293 (2005) <br /> <br />,,kLAB AMA (08/12/05) ~ The city of Guntersville's zoning ordinance allowed <br />the Board of Adjustment for the City of Guntersville to grant special exceptions <br />in residential districts for certain public uses, such as public schools. <br /> [n 2004, Guntersville's board of education requested a special exception tO <br />build a new middle school within a residentially zoned district. The zoning <br />board granted the request. <br /> Neighboring property owners sued. The court ruled in favor of the board of <br />education. <br /> The neighboring property owners appealed, arguing that the zoning board's <br />decision was flawed. <br /> <br />2005 Quintan Publishing Group. Any reproduction is prohibited, For more information please call (617) 542-0048. <br /> <br />215 <br /> <br /> <br />