My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/06/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 10/06/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:38:02 AM
Creation date
9/30/2005 11:48:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
10/06/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with 25-foot front yard setbacks. A variance to the front yard setback requirement will be <br />submitted to the October meeting of the Board of Adjustment. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik advised the wetlands have been delineated and are proposed to be encumbered with <br />drainage and utility easements. The preliminary plat also reflects that the proposed road design <br />will require filling .74 acres of wetlands, which requires a permit. The Lower Rum River Water <br />Management Organization (LRRWMO) is responsible for the administration of the Wetland <br />Conservation Act. The grading and drainage plan will also have to be reviewed and approved by <br />the LRRWMO. Although the City's pending wetland buffer ordinance has.not yet been adopted, <br />the plans include a voluntary wetland buffer ranging in width from 5 to 25 feet. She advised <br />because more than 80 acres of agricultural, native prairie, forest, or naturally vegetated land is <br />being converted to residential use, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was <br />required. The draft EAW was completed and City Council released the draft for the 30-day <br />public comment period. The public comment period ended on July 20, 2005. On August 9th the <br />City Council reviewed the comments to the EAW and determined that an Environmental Impact <br />Statement was not warranted. She advised it is staff's opinion that the existing wetland along the <br />north, boundary of the plat serves as an. adequate transition between Sweet Bay Ridge and the <br />rural sized lots to the north. It is also staff's opinion that the proposed Conservation Easement <br />and Outlot B along the south plat boundary line is an adequate transition between the urban lots <br />and the rural sized lots to the south. The east/west leg of Outlot B may be a temporary buffer <br />with the adjacent lot to the south. If Traprock Street is a through street at some point, and if the <br />trail aligmnent is an east/west diagonal through the plat, then this east/west leg of Outlot B is <br />proposed to be converted to a building site. If the east/west diagonal trail aligmnent through the <br />plat is not feasible, then the trail must run along the south pi'operty line of the plat and the <br />east/west leg of Outlot B should be converted to a conservation easement. <br /> <br />Ms. Frolik indicated per comments received during sketch plan review, the plat has been <br />designed to include a significant trail link between Central Park and Elmcrest Park. The <br />preferred trail aligmnent is an east/west diagonal through the plat. The developer is pursuing <br />DNR approval of this alignment. If DNR denies this trail alignment, then the developer is <br />prepared to dedicate a trail along the south boundary of the propertY, which will also provide a <br />wetland and forest experience. The developer is also required to install a trail parallel to <br />Variolite Street that will go as far south as Alpine Drive NW. She advised a tree inventory and <br />preservation plan has been submitted. The plan indicates that a portion of the lots will be custom <br />graded, which should allow for a greater number of significant trees to be preserved. The <br />Planning Commission conducted the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat on August 8, <br />2005. The future extension of Traprock Street into Traprock Commons and the alternate trail <br />alignment along the south boundary of the property were the main topics of discussion. The <br />Park and Recreation Commission met on August 11 th tO review Sweet Bay Ridge for the second <br />time. They directed staff to investigate the possibility of acquiring land for park dedication <br />purposes, but not within the boundaries of the plat. The Park Commission is looking for <br />additional land for Central Park on the parcel Oakwood owns just east of Central Park. It is <br />staff's position that the City does not have authority to require land for park dedication purposes <br />that is not within the boundaries of the property being platted. She advised the Planning <br />Commission recommended preliminary plat approval with the condition that there be some <br />minimum level of redevelopment that occurs in Traprock Commons to the south before Traprock <br /> <br />P32 <br /> <br />City Council / August 23, 2005 <br /> Page 16 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.