Laserfiche WebLink
a cost of $100,700 which is achievable and within the budget. He stated that Alpine is the next <br />forecasted improvement and would have a higher cost because it is a community park but noted <br />that could include some of the larger features and is also walkable distance to the Peltzer Park <br />neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if there is information available showing the information <br />discussed tonight. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood confirmed that he could have this <br />presentation posted to the website. He anticipated that this would go to the City Council in April <br />and that would allow time for additional resident feedback. He stated that if desired, the <br />Commission could delay action to its April meeting, which would still allow the item to go before <br />the Council in April as well, if it feels that additional input is needed. He noted that ideally, he <br />would like to have the playground replacement done prior to school ending for the summer. <br />Commissioner Loss asked for additional input on timing of approvals in order to meet that <br />construction timeline. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood stated that he feels confident that the <br />Council would approve the recommendation for the playground replacement as the cost is very <br />close to the budgeted amount. He stated that he will also speak with contractors to ensure they <br />could get the replacement into that timeline. He stated that the vendor with the refurbished <br />equipment has agreed to hold the equipment for Ramsey. <br />Commissioner Olson commented that it is very exciting to be able to address the needs of two <br />parks this year rather than just one. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked staff for input on the offering of the neighbors to assist with labor <br />and whether there are barriers to that. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied that there are always a number <br />of challenges with project management and use of volunteers. He commented that this project <br />would have an opportunity to use volunteers in the spreading of the woodchip material. He stated <br />that most of the other aspects of the park improvement are construction related and noted that staff <br />could speak with the contractor to determine if there were other volunteer opportunities. He noted <br />that tree planting could be another volunteer opportunity. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if staff would attempt to incorporate those volunteer <br />opportunities into the project. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood replied that there seems to be an <br />interest from residents and the Commission and therefore would structure the recommendation <br />from the Commission to include use of volunteers. He stated that if the use of volunteers did not <br />work out, they would have the contractor continue to move forward in order to stay on the timeline <br />for the project. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/March 10, 2022 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />