Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION #22-087 <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 FOR IMPROVEMENT <br /> PROJECT #22-05, RIVERDALE DRIVE TRUNK UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS, LLAMA <br /> STREET TO BOWERS DRIVE <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #21-305 adopted October 26, <br /> 2021, the City Council accepted the design services proposal of Bolton & Menk, Inc. for <br /> providing engineering services required to develop final plans and specifications for the purpose <br /> of soliciting bids for the construction of Improvement Project#22-05; and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #22-040 the City Council <br /> approved the plans and specifications prepared by Bolton & Menk, Inc. for the making of such <br /> improvements, and authorizes the advertisement of bids for the same improvements as City <br /> Improvement Project#22-05; and <br /> WHEREAS, pursuant to Ramsey City Council Resolution #22-072 the City Council <br /> authorized entering into a construction contract with Douglas Kerr Underground for the making <br /> of such improvements; and <br /> WHEREAS, while executing the construction contract Douglas Kerr Underground was <br /> informed that the DIP watermain could not be delivered to the project site for 26 weeks or more; <br /> and <br /> WHEREAS, Douglas Kerr Underground has agreed to install plastic watermain in lieu <br /> of the DIP watermain to ensure utilities will be operational in time to serve the Riverstone South <br /> development. <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> 1) The Ramsey City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor and City <br /> Administrator to execute Change Order No. 1 for City Improvement Project #22-05, <br /> Riverdale Drive Trunk Utility Improvements, Llama Street to Bowers Drive, for and on <br /> behalf of the City of Ramsey. <br /> The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br /> ,and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> and the following voted against the same: <br />