My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:28:11 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 1:44:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/12/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Commissioner Peters aye <br /> Commissioner walker aye <br /> Coinii1i ssi oiie' Gengl er afire <br /> Commissioner vanScoy aye <br /> Commissioner Anderson aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 10:5 8 p.m. l <br /> I: <br /> Commission Business <br /> Chairperson Bauer clarified that the Commission is a recommending body that will make a <br /> recommendation to be reviewed by y the City Council. <br /> Commissioner Walker asked staff to provide details on the size of the pole barn on the subject <br /> property versus what others were allowed to build. <br /> i= <br /> Senior Planner Anderson stated that he did some checking of City Code when those comments <br /> were made. He noted that the subject property is roughly 2.2 acres in size which would make it <br /> eligible for detached accessory buildings totally 2,400 square feet in size. He commented that <br /> based on the dimensions in the building permit, the pole barn would be 2,016 square feet which <br /> falls under that allowance. He reviewed the eligibilities for total square footage of detached <br /> accessory buildings compared to lot size. He noted that if someone has a property similar in size, <br /> they would be allowed a similar square footage of accessory buildings. He noted that if a property <br /> } <br /> has existing detached accessory buildings, that would reduce the footprint for an additional <br /> building. <br /> Commissioner Walker asked if staff could check previous building permit applications for that <br /> area to review what was denied versus accepted. <br /> Mr. Kemp stated that he has lived on his property for 32 years and provided an example of <br /> limitations that were placed upon an accessory buildings. He noted that stick garages were <br /> required rather than a pole building. <br /> Commissioner vanScoy stated that he has been on the Planning Commission for many years, and <br /> he cannot recall denial of applications of that manner. <br /> Commissioner walker stated that it would be helpful for staff to research that in order to provide <br /> p <br /> the documentation at the City Council review. <br /> } <br /> Chairperson Bauer asked that any residents in attendance that were denied a pole barn contact City <br /> staff to make that process easier. <br /> Planning Commission/February 24,2022 `= <br /> Page 23 of 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.