My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:28:11 PM
Creation date
4/14/2022 1:44:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/12/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The meeting reconvened at 6:25 p.m. <br /> City Administrator Ulrich reported that during the closed session they talked about a property <br /> negotiation in regard to Outlot B, Elmcrest Sanctuary. Council gave direction for continued <br /> negotiation with the property owner. He stated Staff will take that to the negotiation committee <br /> and continue the negotiations. <br /> 2.02: Discuss Future Meetings for MUSA Boundary and COR Design Framework <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen stated this case is to give Staff <br /> direction on the special meetings regarding the MUSA Boundary and The COR Design <br /> Framework. <br /> Councilmember Specht asked if this was what was going to happen with the Planning Commission <br /> but PACT got in the way. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied yes, adding late last year it <br /> was discussed but it was budget season and it was decided to wait until next year. Now it is closer <br /> to spring. He stated the other thing timing wise,was the planning manager, dependent on tonight's <br /> vote, may be starting mid-April so these discussions would fall in line with that start time. <br /> Mayor Kuzma commented he thought the two topics would merit two separate meetings. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove agreed adding, as a Council, they haven't had a chance to have a lot of <br /> discussion on that. She felt the last attempt got to broad, too big, for that big of a group to have a <br /> valuable discussion. She would like to discuss both areas as a Council and then bring in the <br /> partners with regard to the Planning Commission and EDA to see what their thoughts are. She <br /> wondered if Public Works Staff had any desire to have input. <br /> Councilmember Specht commented it was a great idea. He thought it would be good to have it <br /> more limited. He stated although he could see the benefit of having them both together he was <br /> concerned they might run out of time again with so many people. He thought it was important for <br /> the vision of the City. <br /> Mayor Kuzma asked Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen to set some <br /> times and dates. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen asked Councilmember Musgrove if <br /> she indicated having Council look at it first. He then asked what the Council thought about that, <br /> if it should be brought to a Work Session first and then do a joint meeting. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented the Council hasn't had a discussion about where they <br /> would like to go. She thought it would be valuable to see what the group thought before bringing <br /> in the Planning Commission. <br /> City Council Work Session/March 22, 2022 <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.