Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he felt other areas are under development and will continue <br />to grow and Ward Two will end up with all of the Trott Brook North which is a sizable jump. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that the biggest discrepancy is between Ward One and <br />Ward Two so to give some of One to Two based on what is proposed would even it out the most. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht added that Wards Two and Three are most likely going to grow the most <br />at least short term so that is something to think about. He thought giving Ward Two Ward Three <br />and take the whole river section. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove proposed keeping Wards Three and Four the same given the division <br />between them, noting it is easier with the Alpine line straight as a nice clear cut break. She had <br />one other suggestion that would bring Ward One to 7,014 and Ward Two to 6,723 so it would <br />balance by 172 houses but wasn’t sure if that was enough. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that one thing he liked about the map as presented is a <br />lot of the main artery roads are really good dividers now instead of little side streets. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell stated that she liked Councilmember Musgrove’s idea. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied she didn’t know if that was enough but tried to stay to main <br />streets and some of the other areas had too many houses. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer IV Linton asked for clarification that the Council is comfortable with Wards Three <br />and Four as they are drawn but would like to see more balance between Wards One and Two to <br />see if they can cut out the 10% between top and bottom. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff replied the discussion that yes, Wards One and Two need a little bit <br />of a shift and it seems the consensus is to keep the border between Wards Three and Four as similar <br />to what it was before, just that particular line. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied one for the voters and two for the potential growth. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if this is adjusted if it needs to go back to the County to get reapproved so a <br />timing problem is created. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied it does not have to go back to the County but she <br />would send a courtesy email to get their buy-in so there isn’t an issue as the deadline approaches. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented that it seems like it’s pretty simple. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked why does Ward Two go passed Hwy 10. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer IV Linton replied that is the school district boundary. Ward Two, Precinct One, <br />followed the school district boundaries so they don’t have a precinct with two separate ballots. <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 1, 2022 <br />Page 5 of 15 <br /> <br />