Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Services Director Lasher stated the purpose of this discussion is to consider a <br />detailed recruitment process and timeline for the City Administrator position. In addition, the City <br />Council may wish to look at ways to consider a shortened recruitment schedule in order to reduce <br />the amount of time the city functions without a city administrator. She reviewed the staff report <br />including the advertising outlets. She stated that given Staff capacity the position has not been <br />posted yet as outlined on the timeline in the case. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated he received comments from Councilmember Riley who asked if <br />the requirements could be tightened up, the education and experience acceptable to Council in that <br />it is really broad. He stated Councilmember Riley also asked if the number of days in the position <br />is the number of the days that the position is advertised open enough. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht replied he is comfortable with the education requirement and with the <br />timeline, as it made sense. He stated he appreciated the work that went in to that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell commented that she liked Councilmember Riley’s point in making sure it <br />is open long enough. She asked if there was a way to extend applications through the entire month <br />of March to ensure everyone is captured. She read where it says “agreement negotiated” and there <br />is a five day window after that between May 5, 2020 May 10, 2022 if there is a way to tighten that <br />up to gain days on the front end. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied that negotiating the agreement would include the <br />City Attorney and asked if the request was to shorten the negotiation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell corrected she is asking if there is way to shorten the days after the <br />negotiation when the person is actually hired. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied they have to align the authorization to hire with a <br />Council meeting, which is how she arrived at that date. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell thanked her for answering her question. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she liked how the City profile was done with the use <br />of the City photos, which was a nice way of presenting the information. She felt it was really done <br />well. She agreed with Councilmember Howell to leave the application window open through the <br />end of March. She cited two reasons, one being to accommodate Staff time to get all of the <br />positions posted on the different sites acknowledging that the different sites have different <br />deadlines; and, closing it on March 20, 2022 versus leaving it open another week would open <br />another week that people could potentially see the ad and apply. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that if the process is being moved along, going from March <br />2, 2022 or March 3, 2022 to March 20, 2022 is still 17 days, over two weeks and is two weeks too <br />short. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied the question is if the paper doesn’t publish it until a week later <br />then how many days is that, so then its more like ten days. <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 1, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br /> <br />