Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission, that if it is approved and it is a commercial grade as with others that he be allowed <br />to look at the property to ensure security and safety. He stated he has done that with other <br />commercial businesses in the area. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman commented he supported the inspection by the Police Chief and the <br />condition that the business be only by appointment. <br /> <br />Female resident (name not stated) commented there are ways to know the difference between <br />business and family because they arrived at the pole barn and only the pole barn staying between <br />20 minutes and 2 hours. She stated there have been documentation of the cars. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman replied there can be visitors to a home including deliveries and friends <br />of children, etc. that it couldn’t be certainly determined. He asked that Police Chief Katers take <br />that into consideration as he is doing a security assessment but he had a hard time telling a resident <br />that if the neighbors didn’t know the people coming to a home that it shouldn’t be allowed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked that if this was approved, that the Police Chief sign off on this and <br />add any conditions he deems necessary. She stated she is a former small business owner who <br />operated out of her home and it would have been really distressing to her to have neighbors <br />micromanaging her. She understood the concerns and lack of transparency by Mr. Trout. She <br />stated that if the permit goes through, they will have to find a way to be neighbors to each other <br />and not take this out of proportion. She supports this business and noted given the applicant’s <br />background, he would be able to secure his firearms. She stated there is nothing preventing him <br />from being a gun collector and owning a massive amount of firearms and ammunitions. She stated <br />if this is approved, there will be requirements that would need to be met and if they aren’t it could <br />be dealt with then. <br /> <br />Ms. Schmidt stated the question is not if the neighbors should get along, it is if Mr. Trout violated <br />the original HOP, which she felt he did and now may be approved for a higher level HOP. She <br />stated Mr. Trout wasn’t being held accountable for the violations and that the neighbors were being <br />punished for it. <br /> <br />th <br />Michael Kemp, 6003 178 Lane NW, asked Councilmember Howell what kind of business she <br />had. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell replied it was a piano studio with multiple cars coming to her home. <br /> <br />Mr. Kemp stated he lives on the next block and didn’t care about the cars. He stated there are <br />people who walk their dogs daily and there are small children in the neighborhood. He stated there <br />has been vandalism of cars in their yards. He asked if a music teacher is being compared with a <br />gun shop. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman replied he is comparing the two in regard to the rules for a small <br />business, which is the same. He repeated his comments regarding guns is that it is an intangible <br />difference that is emotionally driven and not statutory. <br /> <br />City Council /March 8, 2022 <br />Page 21 of 38 <br /> <br />