My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:26:22 AM
Creation date
4/15/2022 11:09:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/08/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Administrator Ulrich replied typically with union contract negotiations, Staff are looking at <br />the big compensation items and they do provide a red line version of the contract as a part of the <br />process. Staff is trying to get guidance first on the big compensation items. He thought the <br />negotiation process went well and this year Staff sat down with the Council to negotiate contracts <br />earlier and necessary information was provided. He heard her saying that she would like the base <br />documents up front but he has sometimes had concerns that there is too much information for the <br />Council to review and the important information would get lost but if that is wanted, Staff could <br />provide more information. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher responded to the question regarding incumbents. She <br />stated, specifically with regard to the policy that Councilmember Musgrove mentioned, it was last <br />updated in 2016. Prior to that, the policy mentioned the Charter Commission but the Charter <br />Commission wasn’t subject to that. It is for Boards and Commissions that the City makes <br />appointments for. She stated she learned that the City of Ramsey is one of the few cities in the <br />district that doesn’t have a review process prior to the applications going to the judge. She stated <br />this recruitment is the first one she has done as the City Clerk. She stated the process that she <br />learned from the former City Clerk and followed for this recruitment was that the position was <br />open until filled with applications going to the judge with no recommendation and no review <br />process. She stated she meant no harm and she and her Staff want to do a good job and are not <br />trying to deceive anyone. She stated she welcomed a policy so Staff would know the expectation. <br />She stated maybe there are different interpretations of the wording open until filled because to her, <br />it means hurry to apply because the position will be filled. She thought she had made a mistake in <br />not advertising the position in the November/December issue of the Ramsey Resident because she <br />didn’t think there were any vacancies. She had learned of the vacancies after the deadline for the <br />November/December Ramsey Resident. She stated putting a deadline on was a decision to serve <br />the residents so they would know what to expect. She responded to the question if the six <br />applications were mailed at the same time and that the judge appointed applicant number three <br />applicant number six instead of the first two applications. She did not intend to take opportunity <br />away from anyone, there was a better response than ever before, and the policy that <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced is for the appointments the City makes because the judge <br />makes the decision for the Charter Commission. She stated as to the other questions of not <br />providing information, she would like to look into it because she would always like to do better. <br />Regarding the questions about Facebook, the office was shut down during that time because of <br />COVID but she continued to work through her illness. She apologized that it didn’t go as some <br />individuals would like them to have gone. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich replied that as far as the investigations and the list of questions, if the <br />Council directs they can follow-up on them and ask the City Attorney to help supervise the <br />investigation. He stated he has confidence in Administrative Services Director Lasher that she <br />was doing the best she could at the time. He understood the Council’s perspective but there was <br />no ill intent on the part of the Staff and he would like to prove that. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher agreed that she would like that. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell commented that the conversation has gotten a bit off topic. She assured <br />City Administrator Ulrich that she does hours of research on her own and she doesn’t consider this <br />City Council /March 8, 2022 <br />Page 31 of 38 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.