My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:26:22 AM
Creation date
4/15/2022 11:09:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/08/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilmember Musgrove responded to Councilmember Riley’s comments that the questions <br />have been asked and answered. She asked him if he knew how long it was between the questions <br />being asked and the answers, that is was a struggle and that is a problem. She asked him if that is <br />okay with him. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated this case is about an investigation or inquiry and he is saying that <br />checking the questions and answers for validity should be the starting point. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich clarified there are 23 additional questions or requests for information <br />and asked if the City Attorney should include them in his inquiry. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell replied with his professional purview because she gets wordy. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich summarized the City Attorney will take the list of 23 comments <br />provided by Councilmember Howell along with comments included in the packet. The City <br />Attorney will review the responses, draw some conclusions about the process, and report back to <br />the Council. He asked if two weeks was enough time and if this issue can be completed at the next <br />Council meeting. <br /> <br />City Attorney Knaak suggested that he give the Council something at least preliminary within two <br />weeks and they could decide at that point if the further inquiry is necessary. He stated the <br />Council’s authority in inquiry under the Charter is very significant, there is subpoena power, which <br />he doesn’t anticipate needing. He stated he can’t move forward without expressed authority. He <br />suggesting seeing the preliminary findings. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Woestehoff, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to begin a <br />preliminary inquiry and report back to the Council in two weeks. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Kuzma, Councilmembers Woestehoff, Musgrove, Heineman, <br />Howell, Riley, Specht. Voting No: None. <br />7.09: Discussion of the Responsibilities and Duties of the City Administrator <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated this was added by Councilmembers Musgrove and Howell with <br />supporting documents included in the staff report. He stated the Charter provides that the Council <br />adopt a resolution and they are still looking for that but it has been carried forward with the job <br />description. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she made her points in the previous case regarding <br />having basic things provided and that the City Administrator is in a middle position between the <br />Staff and Council in providing information for cases, getting answers for questions, and providing <br />guidance for who to go to. She stated sometimes she thought they got the support needed and <br />sometimes they don’t. She stated the in other cities, the Staff works at the pleasure of the Council <br />and that is frustrating for her. She asked that basic things be provided such as policies for cases. <br /> <br />City Council /March 8, 2022 <br />Page 34 of 38 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.