My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council - 03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:26:22 AM
Creation date
4/15/2022 11:09:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/08/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />asked Mr. Stuedemann about St. Katharine Drexel’s thoughts on the section of land and the use of <br />it. <br /> <br />Mr. Stuedemann replied their intent is leave the outer outlot as wetlands. <br /> <br />rd <br />Dan Goepfert, 7601 163 Lane NW, stated the location chosen for the PACT Charter School <br />expansion doesn’t seem reasonable because of the concerns already given about putting a <br />commercial operation in a well established neighborhood. <br /> <br />Kathy Reed, 21543 Jarvis Street NW, stated she is a long time resident of Ramsey and a member <br />and trustee of St. Katharine Drexel Catholic Church. She stated the Planning Commission <br />approved the rezoning on February 24, 2022, contingent on approval of the preliminary plat. She <br />stated that the preliminary plat would include responses to the concerns raised over drainage, tree <br />preservation, noise and light pollution. She was surprised to learn the EPB met on February 28, <br />2022 and voted against this proposal. She stated that representatives from neither PACT Charter <br />School nor St. Katharine Drexel attended and were unable to respond. She stated more <br />environmental studies need to be done. She pointed out the land will be used for something and <br />all of this will need to be addressed. She stated with Central Park on one side and the church on <br />the other, the addition of the school seems a good fit. She stated the church is committed to creating <br />a long-term plan for the parcel of land that respects its natural resources and the surrounding <br />community. <br /> <br />Jason Patrow, 16209 Sapphire Street NW, stated no one is against the PACT Charter School <br />expansion but it isn’t wanted in an area where it is going to create difficulties for families who live <br />there. He stated he is an engineering project manager for a large design build contractor. He stated <br />he deals with facilities of these and much larger every day. He knows these require a retention <br />pond. He wasn’t sure if the church will require a retention pond also and by selling this much land <br />to PACT they aren’t leaving themselves enough land to build. He stated this property is different <br />from the other schools because of the wetlands. He commented on the traffic and stated it will be <br />considerable. The site plan also allows for 55 vehicles which he feels isn’t going to be enough. <br />He also sited issues with the site plans for the stadium with a 13-foot elevation change. <br /> <br />th <br />Gary Van Scoy, 5851 147 Lane NW, stated he is on the Planning Commission and is also a <br />member of St. Katharine Drexel Church and is the Chair of the Building Committee and a member <br />of the Finance Council. He stated that in discussions with the City regarding PACT Charter School <br />that Chair Bauer and himself have abstained from the discussions even in Work Sessions. He <br />commented that this is being seen as a benefit both to the school and the church because of sharing <br />of parking and storm water retention ponds. He emphasized that this property will eventually get <br />developed. If the land is used as it is currently zoned there would be 54 units on the 18 acres. He <br />stated there are issues being highlighted that will need to be addressed no matter how it is <br />developed. He stated the property has been sitting there for many years and open to the neighbors <br />but recently had to have signs posted because of damage and noise pollution by neighborhood <br />children in unstructured activities such as four-wheelers. He was in support of this project despite <br />the validity of the concerns raised. <br /> <br />City Council /March 8, 2022 <br />Page 9 of 38 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.