My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/15/2022 - Special
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/15/2022 - Special
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:26:47 AM
Creation date
4/15/2022 11:14:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Title
Special
Document Date
03/15/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
as she couldn’t comment on his reasoning. She stated it was worked on to the best of their ability <br />and thought they had come up with something that is practicable. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma replied he thought they had gotten it figured out at that meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied she thought at the meeting Council saw things but they weren’t <br />the three things they had given direction on. She stated Wards Three and Four, the closest as <br />possible, shifting that section so there is a balance between Wards One and Two. She stated she <br />didn’t remember the third one. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff commented that happened. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if that was version two or the version three option. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff replied they voted on version two, which was the closest to the things <br />while staying practicable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if they did version three or version two. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff replied he was pretty sure they did version two. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell asked if there was something that was asked for that they didn’t see in <br />maps. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht replied it was more that he was curious and thought there were things they <br />were going to investigate but he had never heard back. He knew they had talked about if there <br />was a way to restore Wards Three and Four, take it from Ward Two and Four, and then change <br />Ward One. He stated this happens every ten years. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied she is not the GIS expert and she really relied on <br />Civil Engineer IV Linton. She knew that he and Deputy City Clerk Schmidt and the County had <br />strategized and she felt they got a good product. She stated from a GIS perspective, she wasn’t <br />able to give him answers other than that she thought they had landed as close to where they could. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich agreed, adding that Ward Four needed more so the boundary between <br />Ward Three and Ward Four had to be moved to the west. He stated there was no other way to <br />capture that unless the line was moved somewhere else but that line seemed to make the most <br />sense because it was a very densely populated area rather than try to capture it somewhere else. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht replied he had just wanted to follow up on it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the boundary between Ward Three and Ward Four was not the <br />same. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht confirmed this and added it was because Ward Four needed more people. <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 15, 2022 <br />Page 18 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.