Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Services Director Lasher confirmed this and added their packets included a letter <br />of interest from all five incumbents stating that they would like to be considered for reappointment <br />and all of the Chairs or Vice-Chairs recommended their reappointment. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked Administrative Services Director Lasher if these all fall on the <br />every-other-term category. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher confirmed this, that these all happen to be even numbered <br />terms. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that policy hasn’t been approved yet. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher confirmed this. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if it was correct that the policy they are using right now says <br />Council should have reviewed these prior to any advertisements being done so that they could <br />potentially have more positions open. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied it is correct the policy states that incumbents <br />should be reviewed in a separate process. She stated she is eager to discuss how that can be <br />improved because they can’t implement other parts of the policy by not advertising all seats. She <br />stated the policy is very cumbersome. She stated Councilmember Musgrove is correct but <br />improvement needs to be made because if people want to serve again and the Chair supports <br />reappointment, as does the Council, and it isn’t advertised, then she doesn’t have an applicant pool <br />for the inevitable mid-year vacancies that happen on a regular basis. She continued there are some <br />real challenges in administering the advertising in the Ramsey Resident, which is required by the <br />Charter, because of the timing. If they wait to find out four months ahead of time from when <br />someone’s term is about to expire, the Ramsey Resident has to be contracted in December for a <br />term that ends the end of March. She stated it is hard to time that, it is two completely different <br />processes for advertising in the Ramsey Resident, and it doesn’t work out well for the way the <br />policy is written. She stated that Councilmember Musgrove was right that it does say two different <br />processes but then she can’t administer the rest of the policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht commented the policy will be updated soon. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied that is correct, next week, a week from today. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that if the policy doesn’t work it needs to come before the <br />Council so a policy change could be made. She thought there needed to be a discussion if March <br />31 is a good time to do it, and asked if it works better with the Ramsey Resident, do they want the <br />application process to start at a different time. She thought those were types of policy discussions <br />Council could have that would help make the process easier. She didn’t know if there was anything <br />that could be done because the policy hasn’t been followed and they have been doing it the way it <br />has always been done but it wasn’t based on the policy. She asked if it is correct that is still the <br />Council’s prerogative whether to approve these or not and if they don’t approve them, then there <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 15, 2022 <br />Page 5 of 19 <br /> <br />