My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/22/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 03/22/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:27:25 AM
Creation date
4/15/2022 11:19:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
03/22/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />The meeting reconvened at 6:25 p.m. <br /> <br />City Administrator Ulrich reported that during the closed session they talked about a property <br />negotiation in regard to Outlot B, Elmcrest Sanctuary. Council gave direction for continued <br />negotiation with the property owner. He stated Staff will take that to the negotiation committee <br />and continue the negotiations. <br /> <br />2.02: Discuss Future Meetings for MUSA Boundary and COR Design Framework <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen stated this case is to give Staff <br />direction on the special meetings regarding the MUSA Boundary and The COR Design <br />Framework. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked if this was what was going to happen with the Planning Commission <br />but PACT got in the way. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied yes, adding late last year it <br />was discussed but it was budget season and it was decided to wait until next year. Now it is closer <br />to spring. He stated the other thing timing wise, was the planning manager, dependent on tonight’s <br />vote, may be starting mid-April so these discussions would fall in line with that start time. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented he thought the two topics would merit two separate meetings. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove agreed adding, as a Council, they haven’t had a chance to have a lot of <br />discussion on that. She felt the last attempt got to broad, too big, for that big of a group to have a <br />valuable discussion. She would like to discuss both areas as a Council and then bring in the <br />partners with regard to the Planning Commission and EDA to see what their thoughts are. She <br />wondered if Public Works Staff had any desire to have input. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht commented it was a great idea. He thought it would be good to have it <br />more limited. He stated although he could see the benefit of having them both together he was <br />concerned they might run out of time again with so many people. He thought it was important for <br />the vision of the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen to set some <br />times and dates. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen asked Councilmember Musgrove if <br />she indicated having Council look at it first. He then asked what the Council thought about that, <br />if it should be brought to a Work Session first and then do a joint meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented the Council hasn’t had a discussion about where they <br />would like to go. She thought it would be valuable to see what the group thought before bringing <br />in the Planning Commission. <br />City Council Work Session /March 22, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.