My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/28/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2022
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 04/28/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:11:14 AM
Creation date
4/22/2022 1:37:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
04/28/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Gengler asked the approximate areas of the patios in front of the doors. <br />Mr. Palmby stated that they have been discussing that and the patio would go about four to five <br />feet out and extend past the canopy above the door. <br />Ms. Becker stated that the City could set a minimum size for that patio area. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he is in agreement with Commissioner VanScoy. He <br />commented that the proposed buildings look like Lego blocks and he does not prefer that style. <br />He believed there should be covers on the steps. He asked whether there was a moratorium on <br />townhomes in the City. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Anderson commented that the moratorium applies to City owned land and for <br />multi-family apartment buildings. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that he does not care for the proposed designs. He stated that he <br />would want to see a different style building if this comes forward formally. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walker commented that there is a group that owns the property and will be <br />investing money to complete the project. He stated that if they build something that people do not <br />want to buy, that will fall onto them, not the City. He stated that perhaps this is a more modern <br />design versus traditional. He commented that while he would not purchase a home like this, if the <br />applicant believes it could be sold, they should be allowed to move forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gengler agreed that styles and tastes vary from person to person. She stated that <br />she finds the buildings to be attractive. She stated that she agrees with having a strong front <br />entrance that encourages people to be out and pedestrian friendly. She believed that the patio <br />would encourage that activity more than some of the front porches that exist on other townhomes. <br />She believed the patio reaches the goal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Peters also commented that he likes the look of the buildings. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that the City has had a requirement for the townhomes in The COR <br />to have some sort of porch. He asked how many of those homes are currently vacant, as the <br />comment was made that this is not a desire in the market. <br /> <br />Senior Planner Anderson stated that he would not have that figure. <br />Deputy City Administrator/Community Development Director Hagen commented that the <br />townhomes are individually owned and are not rental units. He stated that the vacancy rate of the <br />apartments is very low and therefore would suspect that the homes are well occupied. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that he has not noticed for sale signs for lengths of time. He <br />stated that since The COR was initiated, the intent was to have a certain basic view of how things <br />would be to encourage variety but also consistency. He stated that this townhome model does not <br />Planning Commission/ March 24, 2022 <br />Page 14 of 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.