Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Andersonintroduced the following resolution and moved for itsadoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #22-083 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT <br />A DETACHED ACCESSORY BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD <br />SETBACK AT THE PROPERTY AT 16165 OLIVINE ST NW <br /> <br />RECITALS <br /> <br />1. Charles Hansen,hereinafter referred to as the “Permittee”, has properly applied for a <br />Variance to construct a detached accessory building (the “Accessory Building”) within <br />the required front yard setback on the property located at 16165 Olivine St NW and <br />legally described as follows: <br /> <br />THAT PRT OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC 16 TWP 32 RGE 25 DESC AS FOL: COM <br />AT NE COR OF SD 1/4 1/4, TH N 89 DEG 15 MIN 46 SEC W ALG N LINE OF SD <br />1/4 1/4 270 FT, TH S 0 DEG 29 MIN 11 SEC W 486.18 FT TO POB, T H CONT S 0 <br />DEG 29 MIN 11 SEC W 225 FT, TH S 89 DEG 30, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br />(the “Subject Property”) <br /> <br />2. That the Subject Property is zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing) Districtand <br />the surrounding parcels are also zoned R-1 Residential (Rural Developing). <br /> <br />3. That the Subject Property is approximately 1.22 acres in size. <br /> <br />4. That the proposed Accessory Building would be 30’ x 64’ feet and 1,920 square feet <br />in size,would have an exterior finish that is similar to the home, and would include <br />soffit, fascia, and eave overhangs to match the home. <br />5. That the proposed detached buildingwould comply with all other applicable standards <br />for detachedaccessorybuildings. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />1.That the proposed use will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />2. That the proposed use will not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment or <br />market value of surroundingproperties. <br /> <br />3. That the proposed use will be constructed so as to be harmonious and appropriate in <br />appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and suchuse <br />will not change the essential character of the area. <br /> <br />4. That the proposed use will not create additional requirements at public cost for public <br />RESOLUTION #22-083 <br />Page 1of 5 <br /> <br />