My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:30:25 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 11:46:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/10/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
478
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff added it is 672 square feet. <br /> Councilmember Heineman asked if the height or width was 48. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff replied the height was 48. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley commented he thought that would make it look special and different. He <br /> stated he didn't have a problem with the size because that is what is available. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen <br /> if he knew how big the digital sign is that is by the West Armstrong Retail. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied he did not. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented he knew the one in Champlin is 14 x 48. <br /> Councilmember Specht commented for traffic driving through, Ramsey would stand out as <br /> different from most areas. He thought it looked nice. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked about the proposed location. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied it would near the old <br /> Diamonds site. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if it was closer to Ramsey Boulevard. <br /> Deputy City Administrator/Community Dev. Director Hagen replied it is closer to Ramsey <br /> Boulevard than to Armstrong Boulevard. <br /> Economic Development Manager Sullivan added the right-of-way is thinner so the vertical sign is <br /> going to fit better there. He stated there may have been issues with overhangs with a horizontal <br /> sign. The company liked the idea of having a vertical sign because the originality of it will be <br /> more eye catching. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff reminded Council that the ordinance being discussed is just a <br /> component of this; the ordinance allows for up to three digital billboards with only one being <br /> owned by the City. He stated there would be limited control of the other two. He felt it was <br /> important that although they like this sign, someone could put another billboard two miles down <br /> the road from it and the City would have less control over it because they don't own it. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley stated that is a good point but he wanted to finalize the size and come back <br /> to this topic. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if it could be seen from both traffic directions. <br /> City Council Work Session/April 26, 2022 <br /> Page 8 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.