Laserfiche WebLink
f' <br /> 5: <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I; <br /> Mr. Roos commented that the are a residential developer and therefore will market that for sale <br /> y : <br /> to a commercial buyer. He stated that the site had been marketed in the past, around the time Suite <br /> Living developed. . <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that in looking at the location he would anticipate that people would be <br /> reluctant to do something with that site when Highway 10 is under construction. He stated that <br /> once that road J ro'ect is com leted,the property could be highly desired. <br /> p p <br /> Motion b Commissioner walker, seconded b Commissioner vanScoy, to close the public <br /> y y <br /> hearing. <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Commissioner Peters aye <br /> Commissioner Walker aye <br /> Commissioner Gengler aye <br /> Commissioner vanScoy aye <br /> Commissioner Anderson aye <br /> y <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 7:57 p.m. <br /> Commission Business <br /> 1 <br /> Commissioner Anderson stated that he is having serious issues with the number of staff comments <br /> past history of this site. He suggested that the applicant <br /> related to the preliminary plat given the pa y gg � <br /> come back with a revised preliminary plat. <br /> I' <br /> Chairperson Bauer stated that generally the process for preliminary plat includes review of staff to <br /> i`p g y <br /> identify items that need to be addressed with final plat. He stated that although there were a <br /> number of comments,he did not believe there were maj or concerns identified. He noted that most <br /> of the comments were fairly routine. <br /> Commissioner walker asked to see the condensed list of comments. <br /> Commissioner Gengler stated that she would like to see a condition related to lighting and <br /> architectural review. <br /> Mr. Roos stated that could be made available for the Council review. He stated that they do not <br /> own the property and currently have it under contract for purchase. He stated that he would like <br /> to keep the process moving to ensure there is not an issue with timing. He stated that there are a <br /> lot of comments,but he did not see any of the comments as significant and most are housekeeping <br /> items that will be changed with final plat. He stated that WSB was contracted to provide a review <br /> Planning Commission/March 24,2022 <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />