Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Services Director Lasher replied if a question, it should be a follow-up question <br /> for clarity. She stated if Council or Staff comes up with a new question they want to ask then, yes, <br /> that should be asked of all the candidates. She added if Council or Staff want to ask a question <br /> about the candidate's past employment that is allowed. She stated there may be questions about <br /> why the candidate isn't employed right now and things of that nature. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove referenced some of the references that were received yesterday,noting <br /> there were no answers on some of them and there was no statement saying there was no comment <br /> on that. She asked why some of those questions weren't answered by the reference. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied there are a few questions that did not get answered <br /> and they have followed-up with the candidates both over the phone and in writing to ask them to <br /> provide that information. She stated unfortunately there are several sets of reference questions <br /> that references are asked and they are based on the level of the position. She stated this is a high <br /> level position and she didn't realize, until they were typed up, that the questions initially asked by <br /> another staff member were not City Administrator level reference questions. She stated there is <br /> overlap but there are a couple of specific questions that didn't get asked because it wasn't for a <br /> senior level position. She stated they are awaiting those responses. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the Council would have them for the deliberation. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied she hoped so and they are going to follow up <br /> again. She stated there are some references that didn't call back at all, even so, that is reflected on <br /> the application where a reference is listed and there are no comments. She stated they are actively <br /> trying to get answers to those questions. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the questions they received were questions that were asked at <br /> the administrative level or if it was a mix. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied it depended on when the person responded. She <br /> stated they caught this mistake late Thursday. On Friday, phone calls were made to all of the <br /> references apologizing and explaining there were a couple of additional questions that they needed <br /> to ask and requested a call back. She stated some references called back;those that didn't received <br /> an email and responses are still being waited for. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove commented it was a holiday weekend so some may have not been in <br /> the office on Friday. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied some gave work emails, some also gave personal <br /> email addresses. She apologized, stated it was an unfortunate oversight, and Staff would do their <br /> best to get those responses. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher began the interviews at 8:58 a.m. <br /> The meeting was recessed at 12:30 p.m. and reconvened at 1:30 p.m. <br /> City Council Special Work Session/April 19, 2022 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />