Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied if a question, it should be a follow-up question <br />for clarity. She stated if Council or Staff comes up with a new question they want to ask then, yes, <br />that should be asked of all the candidates. She added if Council or Staff want to ask a question <br />about the candidate’s past employment that is allowed. She stated there may be questions about <br />why the candidate isn’t employed right now and things of that nature. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced some of the references that were received yesterday, noting <br />there were no answers on some of them and there was no statement saying there was no comment <br />on that. She asked why some of those questions weren’t answered by the reference. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied there are a few questions that did not get answered <br />and they have followed-up with the candidates both over the phone and in writing to ask them to <br />provide that information. She stated unfortunately there are several sets of reference questions <br />that references are asked and they are based on the level of the position. She stated this is a high <br />level position and she didn’t realize, until they were typed up, that the questions initially asked by <br />another staff member were not City Administrator level reference questions. She stated there is <br />overlap but there are a couple of specific questions that didn’t get asked because it wasn’t for a <br />senior level position. She stated they are awaiting those responses. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the Council would have them for the deliberation. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied she hoped so and they are going to follow up <br />again. She stated there are some references that didn’t call back at all, even so, that is reflected on <br />the application where a reference is listed and there are no comments. She stated they are actively <br />trying to get answers to those questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the questions they received were questions that were asked at <br />the administrative level or if it was a mix. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied it depended on when the person responded. She <br />stated they caught this mistake late Thursday. On Friday, phone calls were made to all of the <br />references apologizing and explaining there were a couple of additional questions that they needed <br />to ask and requested a call back. She stated some references called back; those that didn’t received <br />an email and responses are still being waited for. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented it was a holiday weekend so some may have not been in <br />the office on Friday. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied some gave work emails, some also gave personal <br />email addresses. She apologized, stated it was an unfortunate oversight, and Staff would do their <br />best to get those responses. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher began the interviews at 8:58 a.m. <br />The meeting was recessed at 12:30 p.m. and reconvened at 1:30 p.m. <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / April 19, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />