Laserfiche WebLink
Senior Planner Anderson referenced a previous discussion Commissioner Anderson had with the <br />applicant related to the number of trips and noted that the applicant estimated deliveries and noted <br />that employees should also be counted. <br />Mr. Hillman commented that he only has one employee and estimated seven including deliveries <br />and the employee. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that the applicant is also including Amazon and other delivery <br />vehicles in that number and did not believe thosewould be counted if they were going to a home <br />as Amazon could be delivering a product ordered by the home. <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that he would not count Amazon and those delivery vehicles <br />as every home has those. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that in terms of a traffic count it would seem to be two trucks <br />(semi or dock) and three for the employee. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson clarified that all those things need to be written down in the case the <br />Commission supports the request. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walker agreed but wanted to ensure Amazon and those types of deliveries are not <br />counted. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer referenced a property that is blacked out on the map and asked if that is wetland. <br />City Planner McCann replied that is the PUD zoning district. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked the specifics on the PUD. <br />City Planner McCann was unsure. He noted that it appears to be residential. <br />Senior Planner Anderson replied that is a PUD, but he is confident it was residential deviation <br />from Code. He stated that about a decade ago there was a HOP request from the property at 6160 <br />that was denied. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walker suggested a motion noting that he would be open to suggestion on <br />additional conditions. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson suggested that the applicant work with staff to define the number of trips, <br />hours of operation, and that there be inspection by the Fire Chief to determine if modifications <br />would be necessary to support manufacturing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he would agree with the first two conditions but would be <br />opposed to the condition requiring inspection by the Fire Chief. He stated that if the manufacturing <br />is moved over the applicant could come back and make that request and that could be brought in <br />at that time. <br />Planning Commission/April 28, 2022 <br />Page 10 of 20 <br /> <br />