My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:09 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Pro Tem Riley commented that he isn't trying to stifle speech or keep anything off an <br /> agenda but is simply suggesting a way to manage the length of meetings because he feels it is a <br /> disservice to residents to make them wait that late to hear a case. He felt Staff help in creating the <br /> agenda and Council could help in managing the agenda by not adding to things and helping to <br /> prioritize. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented he supported setting a time for not starting a case after a <br /> set time. He asked if historical data on stop times could be obtained and used as a reference. <br /> Councilmember Howell corrected that she is not saying anyone is currently trying to stifle speech <br /> but it could potentially happen. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented that he liked the policy that a meeting be set on another <br /> day during the week so every agenda item gets addressed. <br /> Councilmember Heineman commented he didn't support restrictions to City Council meeting <br /> lengths because they are there to serve. If residents are there to speak,the Council can move cases <br /> to accommodate them. He felt it didn't happen very often. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley stated the consensus was inaction and requested Staff help to prioritize <br /> agenda items and balance the lengths. <br /> 2.04: Continued Discussions on Developing a Charter Commission Recruitment Policy <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher reviewed the staff report on prior discussions involving <br /> the development of the Charter Commission recruitment policy. She referenced the "Updated <br /> Draft" of the policy for their review and revision tonight. She asked if it was the case that there <br /> was Council consensus that they were not interested in having incumbents reapply, that simply <br /> their letter of interest to reapply should be forwarded to the Chief Judge. It would not state that it <br /> is "recommended" or "please reappoint", it would just state that "the following individuals are <br /> requesting reappointment". She stated unless she is really misunderstanding, she is thinking there <br /> would be no incumbent reapplication process. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley asked if there was Council agreement on that. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated it would depend on the rest of the policy. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley asked if she may want incumbents to reapply. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied only if they decide, as a part of the policy, that they are not <br /> going to have members of Commissions on the Charter as well. She stated she knew they had <br /> talked about that vertical appointment and if some of those terms end and come up, it depends on <br /> the policy on that. She stated she guessed they wouldn't be reappointed then. <br /> City Council Work Session/May 10, 2022 <br /> Page 10 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.